Well moat likely it be harder to commit crime. If billy has a gun but Joe doesn't and billy robs Joe, a
Joe simply doesn't afford his house anymore, but If Joe has a gun Joe can stop billy.
'MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE BEING KILLED WITH GUNS
SO WE NEED MORE GUNS TO STOP THE KILLING!'
IS A LOGICAL WAY OF THINKING? DO AMERICANS GO TO THE SHELTER TO GET TWO DOGS
AFTER THEIR CHILD IS BITTEN BY A DOG?
OR DO THEY DEMAND THE DOG OWNER
TO GET SOME TRAINING?