Am I wrong?

I gotta better idea: cannibalism. While at best morally and ethically dubious, it would simultaneously solve the problems of overpopulation and starvation.

But you normally eat three meals a day and what about reproduction? They would reproduce faster than you eating them. Besides, wouldn’t there probably be one more person on earth left to starve, which technically would be considered world hunger?

At the very least, it would significantly slow it down, and hunger sure as hell wouldn't be an issue.

oh. ok