I watched a hair tutorial and now I’m drawing hair way better

Link?

Please I am dogshit at hair

Yeah, I just don't post it.

The most recent art post was me trying to sell a painting. Like a month ago

Still. I gotta watch more tutorials.

I think me is just practice's and natural talent.

But I am still crap in some areas

I wonder if you can be good without a "natural talent"...

for me, art was just practice and finding the right tutorials

oh yeah, and lots of stress

Yes.
Practice. There is an entire trend of artists showing their very fist drawing all the way up to their best work.

The first drawing is always terrible, but slowly the skill behind it improves.

https://youtu.be/88khFjZwkl0

thx

you still exist?

hell yeah

Why does every fuсking lgbt person draw, go***mn.

me included?

Hyperbole.

what better way to watch our rights get taken away and be able to do nothing about it than by drawing

You're literally exemplified by society. You have an entire month to celebrate you that the federal government partakes in. If a non-anonymous account critisizes you publicly they'll lose their job. You had an entire 'trans day of vengance' in which you planned to do terrible things. People who call you out like Matt Walsh have to have to have security, because they're endlessly threatened. Don't give me no 'rights taken away' bullshit, you're not marginalized. You're exemplified by the culture at large, and by saying this I'm against the culture at large. Watch, you're going to post this in the LGBT stream and I'm going to get endlessly critized.

i don’t post my internet arguments in lgbtq

if you haven’t looked at the recent laws that are being passed, they’re targeting trans people. 400 of them just this year.

nobody celebrates trans days of vengeance.

if i celebrated pride month here, i’d be ridiculed.

matt walsh ain’t calling nobody out. he’s a f**king fascist and i would like to see a single argument he has that can’t be countered by me

You say they target the transgenders, but what do they do? Show me one singular law that removes basic human rights from someone that calls themselves the opposite of what they are.

And yes, the 'trans day of vengance' was celebrated. There was violence in the cities.

You'd be ridiculed here, but that's only because this is a corner of the internet full of traditionalists and trolls. In the virtual public square (twitter, reddit, youtube), you'd be agreed with in general.

As for the last comment, don't get cocky and assume you know it all, you don't. Neither do I, nor does anybody.

https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/html/SB01029I.htm

that’s just one of 400+ btw, and science actually supports trans people. you just sent it because it doesn’t fit your world view. the WHO and the AMA both support trans people, but you’re prolly gonna say something like “uhhhh but but politics make them change their minds” and not actually make a valid argument

you know, you’re right. since some people are also stupid enough to shoot up schools, we should ban all guns since everyone is stupid enough to do that. you’re absolutely right. wooo hoo.

dude, just because people are accepted by society doesn’t mean the old men sitting in court will. a study showed that every law, popular or not has around a 30% chance of being passed.

Okay brother, I'd like to ask you to stop insulting me. I don't like debating with people who insult others within their arguments, if I were to be all pretentious and everything toward you, you'd stop arguing with me. If I were to mock you within my arguments and call you an idiot, you'd get even more angry. So please, I'm asking you to be respectful, or I won't reply to you anymore.

That bill doesn't remove any rights from 'trans' people. Read this text from the bill:

relating to civil liability for, governmental health plan coverage
of, and public funding for gender modification procedures and
treatments.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The legislature finds that:
(1) as evidenced by a 2018 video of a Vanderbilt
University Medical Center administrator who promoted gender
modification surgeries as financially beneficial and stated that
entire clinics are being financed by phalloplasties, the medical
community has knowledge that many so-called "gender affirming"
treatments are not in the best interest of the health of the patient
but rather are being promoted for the monetary gain the health care
facilities will receive from providing those treatments; and
(2) the medical community has a conflict of interest
in offering gender modification treatments and procedures because
those treatments and procedures create lifelong patients as a
result of required follow-up visits after those treatments and
procedures.

Here is what the bill defines as being medical malpractice:

(1) a surgery that sterilizes the patient, including:
(A) castration;
(B) vasectomy;
(C) hysterectomy;
(D) oophorectomy;
(E) metoidioplasty;
(F) orchiectomy;
(G) penectomy;
(H) phalloplasty; and
(I) vaginoplasty;
(2) a mastectomy;
(3) the prescription, administration, or supply of any
of the following medications that induce transient or permanent
infertility:
(A) puberty-blocking medication to stop or delay
normal puberty;
(B) supraphysiologic doses of testosterone to
females; or
(C) supraphysiologic doses of estrogen to males;
and
(4) the removal of any otherwise healthy or
non-diseased body part or tissue.

(continued)

Read this section of the bill:

A physician or health care provider who provides a gender
modification procedure or treatment to a patient is:
(1) liable to the patient for a malpractice claim in
the provision of the procedure or treatment; and
(2) strictly liable to the patient for the patient's
medical, mental health, and pharmaceutical costs, including costs
associated with reversing a gender modification procedure or
treatment, incurred for the life of the patient as a result of the
procedure or treatment.

Another thing, this section of the bill is one that you'd like. I think it's logically backwards, because if transgenderism is real, then it must apply to children, and if it is not real, it must not apply to anybody. Anyhow, read this section as well:

Sec. 74B.005. EXCEPTIONS. Sections 74B.003 and 74B.004 do
not apply to the provision by a physician or health care provider,
with the consent of a child's parent or legal guardian, if
applicable, and the coverage by a health benefit plan of
appropriate and medically necessary gender modification procedures
or treatments to a patient who:
(1) is born with a medically verifiable genetic
disorder of sex development, including:
(A) 46,XX chromosomes with virilization;
(B) 46,XY chromosomes with undervirilization; or
(C) both ovarian and testicular tissue; or
(2) does not have the normal sex chromosome structure
for male or female as determined by a physician through genetic
testing.

There's a lot more text in the bill that is likely significant, but I think I've highlighted most of the stuff that laymen like ourselves can understand. It's moreso insurance things from then on.
So, to conclude, the bill does NOT take any basic human rights away from anyone. It simply bans doctors from doing procedures on minors without parental consent that have permanent or potentially permanent effects on said minor.

I'm not going to respond to the rest of the comment, because you're being extremely rude and you're assuming that I think this, or that I think that. If I were to tell you that you supporting abortion meant that you probably supported infanticide, that'd be absolutely crazy. That's despite the fact that I think abortion is infanticide.

(continued)

In a similar manner, you saying that supporting gun rights means that I also support school shootings is crazy. That is despite the fact that you probably think that supporting gun rights is supporting school shootings, which is fairly illogical (But I won't get into that).

By the way, science does not support transgenderism. Science is the process of testing something until it's able to be essentially proven true. It is a false philosophy that supports transgenderism, science has less of a role than one might think in the formative beliefs of transgenderism. By the way, if you're not an atheist, most all Judeo-Christian theology precludes the idea of transgenderism, simply because you cannot be born in the wrong body, because God is perfect and has never made a mistake.

Anyhow, I'll explain the part about how it's based upon false philosophy:
Transgenderism is based in the belief of absolute subjectivity. This belief says that there is no objective truth that exists anywhere in the world, and only what YOU think is correct is actually correct. For reasons that should be fairly obvious (E.G. we all live in the same reality), this is not true.
However, modernists and the like have taken this to an extreme, meaning that anyone who thinks themselves to be something they aren't are actually that thing. This means that if you believe in absolute subjectivity, then a man who thinks he is a woman MUST be a woman. A woman who thinks herself to be a man MUST be a man. A man who thinks himself to be an animal MUST be an animal.

Therefore, you have been decieved in your opinions, I'd like to respectfully ask you to not be rude, and have a great day, brother.

alright fine i’ll stop

the universal human rights says that a person can do whatever they want with their body, so this is restricting their basic human rights. there’s really not much else i can say about it.

By that logic, I have a human right to commut suicide. Since the bill applies to minors only, that means that minors have a right to commit suicide.

I know you don't mean this, please elaborate further.