Which occurred multiple times over multiple years? Which had more people involved in total? Which set out to compel the system to change some practices and which set out to totally end and replace said system?
You're trying to minimize the gravity of one by highlighting the gravity of the other while equating the other with as the first one. So your bogus argument is flawed right there, as it is premised on what occurred in the one as being bad when committed by the other, contradicting your own point, as it acknowledges the very negatives you're attempting to minimize and dismiss.
Regardless, words mean things, and sloppily and contradictory retroffitted whataboutisms won't change that.