TARA READE contemplates that one more arrest is warranted

And when Stormy tried to blackmail Trump with her shyster lawyer, she lost and now she owes Trump 300,000...

At least the OrangeMan will not be disbarred from practicing Law
in D.C. and Arkansas for committing perjury under oath.

...perjury, errr to paraphrase: "knowingly giving evasive and misleading responses" during discovery in
Jones vs. Clinton.

https://www.arcourts.gov/sites/default/files/opc_opinions/2000-013.pdf

errr... "Bill Clinton did lose his license to practice law because he was found to have committed perjury during....."

Source:
https://homework.study.com/explanation/did-hillary-clinton-ever-lose-her-license-to-practice-law.html

Come on, man. If this was Hunters laptop, you wouldn't have forgotten Karen McDougal?

...so, next thing one is to expect is Toejoe alleges that Bruce Willis acquired his nervous system problems from contracting an STD left behind by Hugh Herfner and NeverTrump?

Why not? holds the same relevant of truth that MAGA has never produced since J6.

MAGA may not have ever produced your relevant truth, yet the fact remains:

Article I Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution is what sparked the J6 Unarmed Rebellion.

Yes, and Texas tried to sue Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania
over Article II Section 1, clause 2 & 3 to no avail.

...both Articles regard the legality of elections being based upon their "legislators thereof"
and the point has been made that these 4 states used the Lockdowns and fear of a 5 day flu virus; to hastily have other segments of their state government than their "Legislators thereof" make changes to the way their states times, places, and manner of elections are conducted in a rush.

Governors did it, State Supreme Courts did it, yet not the dually elected legislative body, whom are beholden to the people in ways the others are not. Keeping the legislative bodies of each of those states out of determining the times, places, and manner of how their elections were conducted is not supported by the U.S. Constitution, and as such they each fraudulently certified their electors.

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/why-texass-election-suit-failed-to-reach-first-base-in-the-supreme-court

Regarding Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia:
1. There is no argument that time places and manner were changed in a rush
2. There is no argument that these changes were instituted by people other
than their "legislators thereof".

You realize that every court in America rejected voter fraud claim?

Why is this so difficult to accept?

Not trying to be insulting, but to continue to reject reality makes you appear less than credible

One can find solace in the truth.

Your malarkey has no bearing on my credibility.

....malarkey for example: "...every court in America",

(LUDICROUS, Overexaggerated Statement by a fool)

(pause, yawn) ....please.

So you consider the Supreme court decision nullifying Trump's election fraud claims to be over exaggerated statements committed by ludicrous fool's?

The definition of MALARKEY, in this case, is taking the word of a man, over the rule of law.

Thought processes that support Dictatorship's, over a Republic and by the people, is Un American, on the level of treason.

Do go on further... you've more to say... have you not???