It’s so funny, isn’t it?
“For our next trick, we’ll do a music video with three Taylors. It’ll have a Good Taylor, a Bad Taylor, and a Giant Taylor. They’ll all hang out and bring out different sides of each other while doing things like playing guitar, being chased by ghosts, crashing dinner parties, and drinking wine on rooftops. It’ll be so self-aware, so ironic. And to cap it off, we’ll say it was ‘directed by Taylor Swift.’ Fans will love that.”
Well, that was their first mistake. Because they didn’t even bother to say which “Taylor Swift” did the directing. Seems they’re expecting us to believe that it’s really just one Taylor Swift (the “real one” — *snort*) playing a bunch of different roles, writing the music, performing it, and crafting the overall visual story-concept itself.
First of all, that’s unrealistic, no one is that multi-talented. At least, few people are, which stacks the odds heavily against the theory they’re pushing.
Second of all, they goofed and put the Taylors in some of the same scenes together. How does one person simultaneously play two or three roles? Impossible.
Finally, how’d they get the giant Taylor Swift so big? Huh? I only know of one technology capable of that, and it starts with a C and rhymes with cologne, but without the extra syllable.
Tl;dr — Clones. They’re clones. Still don’t believe me, check Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, which furnished proof-of-concept that clone armies can be used in films and American audiences won’t object.