What does everyone think?

What would the rules be? Last time was chaos...

Our Deepen Diversity bill has been blocked and we know why?

imgflip.com/i/7c8sj3

But OP argues that "The people IG is messaging would likely have voted nay regardless of whether IG told them to or not."

I don't agree with Incognito guy telling people to vote against your bill.
But there's nothing I can do about it. TECHNICALLY Incognito isn't allowed to participate in this stream's politics, but that's a stream rule, not a imgflip rule.
In other words: Incognito can do whatever he wants on other streams unless it violates imgflip the company's rules.

"I don't agree with Incognito guy telling people to vote against your bill.
But there's nothing I can do about it. TECHNICALLY Incognito isn't allowed to participate in this stream's politics, but that's a stream rule, not a imgflip rule.
In other words: Incognito can do whatever he wants on other streams unless it violates imgflip the company's rules."

Hence is why I want a bill saying that banned users that run a party will result in the party not being recognised by the owner. How about that?

Because I want to strengthen Article 14 Sections 4 & 5...

Article 14: The Rights of Citizens
Section 4: All users (besides those that are banned) are permitted to hold polls, and petition/bring a bill to congress and the senate. It is up to the HOC and HOS to see that it is voted on.
Section 5: All users (besides those that are banned) are permitted to found their own news blog, political party, and business, only as long as it does not directly go against the site TOS or stream rules.

Section 5 said banned users can't make a party, but the constitution never said they cannot run a party nor be party leader. So IncognitoGuy managed to find a loophole to these Sections of the Article.

Olympian already banned Incognito's parties. Everyone is just ignoring that and running anyway. Again, there's nothing stopping people from doing what they want on other streams.

We can just not recognise the party if BritishMormon is running the party. And we can just call his mail-in voting garbage "spam" under ToS

Not allowing his crew to vote will be up to Olympian, I'd imagine. So we'll see what happens.
But generally stream specific rules have no power outside the stream.

This would be an amendment and it'll definitely require a 2/3 supermajority. But it won't likely pass anyways. Plus this isn't just going to be specific for BritishMormon, this would be for permabanned users in general (what if someone else got banned from this stream?)

Perma- banned users just eventually come back with new accounts. Not saying this isn't a good bill, just that it won't do anything...

"Perma- banned users just eventually come back with new accounts. Not saying this isn't a good bill, just that it won't do anything..."

How about we can also do what MSMG do with permabanning users' alts too.

Side Bar:

This possible bill won't ban IncognitoGuy's crew from voting unless they're already banned.

I think:
You have to have posted 5+ memes on this stream, be on imgflip for at least a year and be on this stream for at least a month. 1 assassination per week, assassination blocks posting or commenting for 24 hours. There will also be a secret service of the mechanic is brought back

I wish Richard Chill would come back. I wanted to 'assassinate' him on this stream...