Ill defined. The Talmud, as written, is without a definition of god. Therefore, christians can view it as primitive. Yet, Japanese religion, is also without a definition of god. The primitive goal of clergy keeping order when society operates on physical PTSD; achieved.

God of Divinity, to include demon kings; has no definition. Buddhism, Islam, and Christianity compose a definition that does not exclude the god of Divinity. Buddhism, Islam, and Christianity each have mechanism to include, exclude, and interpret the god of grace. Buddhism excludes a mystical blessing god; only prayers being answered by nature.

Why would they {talmud} make a "noahide law" to not blaspheme God, if they don't ever state who it is that they want to promote as being God? Pretty sure they promote the anti-Christ as "god", but I could be remembering that wrong.

In the more primitive view, each prophet shared the same poorly defined god as mentioned by each prophet's interpretation... So Noah was a prophet, his interpretation stood for his day and age. Yet, no noahide law exists because blessings change as the world ages.