Andrew idc if you kill me

Much more reasonable title

#removeandrewsmod

He's been a real help with getting MSmg through the arkuums and setting up the rules.

Wouldn't change a thing if we remove him from MSmg, we'd still have to beg for him to do something when unfortunate events occur.

Most users have a problem with the bans and strict moderation, that's going to continue whether or not he remains a mod on MSmg,
so that's something completely unrelated with him being an MSmg mod.

😐

``andrew idc if u kill me 😡🤬🤬😡``

Come up with an argument, it's funnier that way.

I ddnt make the title, view the approval history

Unfortunately, I do not have access to your Approval History.
It's on your image, and I can only laugh about it for now.

He's not a mod

It might be good to know that you can report mods to owners if they continue editing image titles when you make it clear you don't appreciate it. It's a thing.

No, site mod status

Imgflip would surely be happy to discuss the conduct of Community Mods with MSmg mods.

MSMG mods ain't the problem

Never seen Andrew being named that way outside of MSmg, except for in Kewlew's several reservations 💀

how tf are you not a mod

Removed myself.
How is it relevant? 🧍‍♂️

Nah, peachytroopa removed you

Check logs.
I love Peach, and I would have divorced her if it had ever come to that.
Usually, it's me who removes me. It's an years-old tradition.

He litteraly does what's asked of him.
Maybe quote part of the ToS he's violating and report it to Imgflip, that's a better idea than making posts on MSmg.

Depends on what you flagged and who took any moderation action on the flag.
This doesn't sound like something you can or should report to Imgflip, it would be a better idea to talk to a site mod to clarify what happened. They always respond to cool questions about what they do.

If you're not familiar with the manner of response from site mods, it's the generally accepted way to have formal conversations, especially on the internet. Get familiar with it, it helps.

Would you go through the trouble of finding me the porn that a site mod is posting?🧍‍♂️plz

It doesn't completely qualify as a private part, apparently.
You cannot post an exposed va**na or fully-exposed boobs. That would come under "private parts."

The first one of Andrew's images you linked is the line between "NSFW" and "porn" (porn, according to Imgflip's definition). Anything revealing more than Andrew's image, is disallowed.

Community Mods didn't make the rule. Imgflip allows it, and if it allows it, it allows it for everyone. Allowing it is how they interpret their ToS.
You can post an image equivalent to Andrew's post, or the same image on the Fun stream and it will be allowed.

When

did I say that he's allowed to post porn because he's a site mod? 💀

Every social site is 13+, it's the law.

Imgflip is not supposed to raise our children for us, if we don't allow our children unfiltered internet, they shouldn't be allowed to browse social media.
NSFW Week, however, is tradition on Imgflip. I don't think anyone on MSmg would be familiar with it.

Second, a website's administrators can decide what they allow.

That, sir, is a demonstration.
It's the "most NSFW" image you can post on Imgflip without being subject to removal.
Stream rules might raise the bar, but they cannot lower it. You can't create anything "more NSFW" than that on streams that allow it, but users can definitely disallow even "less NSFW" posts on their own streams.
I hope that makes sense.

The stuff you saw was pretty common on Imgflip until all the kids discovered the place.

That's not even borderline, it's allowed by Imgflip. Didn't think anyone would even need to ask if it's allowed, it is.

It's marked NSFW and is protected by the "no private parts" clause.
It's as much as you would see walking down the street.

#removeandrewsmod

#removeandrewsmod

#removeandrewsmod