A new Project Veritas drop

Aren't you tired of putting you're faith in Project Veritas only for it to be confirmed that their video clips don't come anywhere near to proving what you say they do?

Only the willfully ignorant and confused people of the world would agree with you, anti. In other words, other libs & leftists.

Well, and courtrooms where everything Project Veritas have ever done is completely inadmissible.

Hmmm....
Legal Victories
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/legal-victories-pv/

Directed Verdict: Teter vs. Project Veritas
In 2016, democratic political operatives’ dark art of orchestrating violence at Donald Trump rallies was just one example of the lengths to which they were willing to go. At one rally, an older woman, and a Democratic activist, Shirley Teter, claimed a Trump supporter had cold-cocked her at a Trump rally during his 2016 Presidential campaign. Scott Foval, a prominent Democratic activist at the time, claimed credit for orchestrating these protests.

An agent of Democracy Partners argued, and Project Veritas published this claim, Teter was one of Democracy Partners’ “bird dogs,” meaning she intended to create an incident. Teter then sued Project Veritas and Project Veritas Action.

With a gang of four high-priced, high-powered lawyers, the disabled, elderly woman waged a campaign of costly federal litigation. On the second day of the trial, at the request of the Judge, our lawyers made an oral argument for a very rare Rule 50 Directed Verdict believing the plaintiff, had not presented a credible case. The judge heard the oral arguments on the Directed Verdict Motion from both sides, and he ruled against Teter. Effectively, the judge ruled that the jury could not possibly have ruled in favor of Teter:

... if citizens and the media are handcuffed by a fear of liability, that’s detrimental to political discourse, it is detrimental to society as a whole, and it is detrimental, really, to our fundamental freedom....If I've gotten this wrong, and the Fourth Circuit says that this is not what the law is, I hesitate to think where the First Amendment is going in this country.

- United States District Court Judge Martin K. Reidinger, May 2019

You can see MORE legal victories via the link I copied, anti. I think Judge Reidinger's comment directly above says a lot about our 1st Amendment. The Left loves to hide facts and truths via censorship, intolerance, manipulation, lies and control. It isn't hard to see if you open your eyes...

I don't think you see the difference between allowing PV to speculate wildly on their conclusions, and a court actually using these videos as evidence of really anything at all.

The case you described basically said this was not a libel case. But where does it actually say "oh, yeah, I guess they HAVE proven that the Democrats use bird dogs..."?