True, but when voting on federal law, there has to be some give eventually. If two states are all that are needed to break 46-46 senate vote, the populations with less than one million each, shouldn't have the same power as a state with 40million. Or, a state that has eight times their population. I have a hard time seeing this as anything other than the tyranny of the minority.
I recognize the intrinsic flaws with such a system regarding economic law, but social law should be by popular vote as no one loses money over it (fundamentally.)
But through this way? A Wyoming voter has a voting weight of 8.0 While a Californian voter has a voting power of 1.0.