Imgflip Logo Icon

Jeez man what do you want a metal or something? Shut up already!

Jeez man what do you want a metal or something? Shut up already! | I've rounded a corner. Not gone around it, but
rounded it off so I won't catch myself on it again.
That pointy protrusion was partisanship. Do you know the difference between knowledge and
wisdom? Knowledge is knowing a thing. Wisdom is
understanding it. The dust hasn't finished settling,
but I have finally internalized my longstanding
belief that political labels are counterproductive.
At last I've put my finger on why. Democrat and republican I get--those descriptors
are shorthand for "affiliated with this party". But
"liberal" and "conservative" --those aren't nouns.
They're adjectives. Saying "those liberals" or "he's
a conservative" reduces people to a mere portion
of who they are, at best. At worst it pastes over who
they are with an imaginary caricature that serves no
purpose other than further dividing and alienating an
already divided and alienated people. For most of my life I've identified as A liberal.
And part of what A liberal does is support other
liberals and square off against non-liberals. Over
the past several years I've encountered numerous
people who hold conservative beliefs and are all
around decent individuals. This incongruity coexisted
with my identity as A liberal until I began to encounter
more and more people who hold liberal beliefs and
are basically rotten people to anyone who isn't also a
liberal--and for reasons that are hypocritical, myopic
and logically unsound. In other words, no set of
character traits in endemic to either group. There are
good people and shitty people represented in both
demographics. There is no correlation between
political views and personal character. From there is was a short but painstaking
step to really recognize that it isn't the
other party that's the enemy. It's the act
of objectifying people by conflating what
they believe with who they are. A mistake I
will make every effort to avoid making again. There's an expression I'm fond of:
small change, big difference. (Just ask
a barber if you don't believe me.) This
small adjustment to my schema has
profoundly altered my perspective. It has
allowed me to reconcile my fondness for
people whose political ideologies I don't
subscribe to, and my disdain for people
whose political ideologies mirror my own.
The ideology is incidental to the equation.
The deciding factors are sensibility and
temperament. I either find someone to
be pleasant, open-minded, honest and
logically consistent, or I don't. Period. And I will never again refer to a person as A liberal
or A conservative. Those labels deserve the same
fate as our friend depicted in the desert. If it was
relevant, I would say "a person of liberal persuasion"
or "someone with conservative ideologies".
Beliefs mean nothing by themselves--it's what is
done with them that matters. It's unlikely that a
person's beliefs would be accurately encompassed
by a single word anyway, and even less so as
they change over time. Mine certainly have. Simple. Obvious. Vapid even. Not sure why it
took me so long to puzzle this out. But I'll be
damned if it hasn't changed my life.
                              --SaintRanger (Former Liberal and current person who holds
generally liberal and some conservative views,
but who prizes kindness and civility above all.) | image tagged in blank white template,desert bones | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
348 views 5 upvotes Made by Hannibal_Lecher 2 years ago in The_Think_Tank
8 Comments
K8. M
3 ups, 2y
Well put and you're right the sooner we can see people as just that people, individuals with hopes, dreams, fears, baggage just like ourselves rather than putting everyone into boxes of our own perception and judgment the more we can move toward genuine understanding and compassion even if we don't fully embrace all the same beliefs. Thanks for posting!
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THIS IS, LIKE, THE FIRST CONVERSATION OF, LIKE, THREE CONVERSATIONS THAT LEADS TO YOU BEING A REPUBLICAN . LIKE, THE | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
I never saw that movie. Is this an inside reference I'm missing?
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Yes
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Heh, "we're the ghosts of partisanship past and future, here to show you how blind, unquestioning devotion to polemic will taint your relationships and ruin your life."

Your caption inspired the idea for a meme where someone decides to come out to their social group that they actually feel like a member of the opposite political party.

Offspring: "The me you know is 'x', but after a lot of soul-searching I've realized that deep down I identify as 'y'."
Mother: "It's just a phase! You'll grow out of it."
Father: "Get out of my house. I'd rather you were dead than a @#$& 'y'!"
Sibling: "It doesn't matter to me whether you're 'x', 'y' or 'z'. I love you no matter what."
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Waterboy Kathy Bates Devil | NO OFFSPRING OF MINE IDENTIFIES AS ‘Y’ BECAUSE I EQUATE ‘Y’ WITH THE PERSONIFICATION OF EVIL THAT EXISTS IN THE TRADITIONAL MYTHOLOGY OF OUR | image tagged in waterboy kathy bates devil | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Probably missed this movie too?
1 up, 2y
"Straw-man constructs are the Debil!"
Yeah, she admitted to being wrong in that movie. Misguided by her own fear and trauma into lying to her son with the intention of protecting him, only to end up driving an unnecessary wedge at both of their expense.
Great film! Henry Winkler was a riot.
1 up, 2y
I want a metal ^_^
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 5
  • Blank White Template
  • Desert Bones
  • Blank White Template
  • Blank White Template
  • Blank White Template
  • Blank White Template
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    I've rounded a corner. Not gone around it, but rounded it off so I won't catch myself on it again. That pointy protrusion was partisanship. Do you know the difference between knowledge and wisdom? Knowledge is knowing a thing. Wisdom is understanding it. The dust hasn't finished settling, but I have finally internalized my longstanding belief that political labels are counterproductive. At last I've put my finger on why. Democrat and republican I get--those descriptors are shorthand for "affiliated with this party". But "liberal" and "conservative" --those aren't nouns. They're adjectives. Saying "those liberals" or "he's a conservative" reduces people to a mere portion of who they are, at best. At worst it pastes over who they are with an imaginary caricature that serves no purpose other than further dividing and alienating an already divided and alienated people. For most of my life I've identified as A liberal. And part of what A liberal does is support other liberals and square off against non-liberals. Over the past several years I've encountered numerous people who hold conservative beliefs and are all around decent individuals. This incongruity coexisted with my identity as A liberal until I began to encounter more and more people who hold liberal beliefs and are basically rotten people to anyone who isn't also a liberal--and for reasons that are hypocritical, myopic and logically unsound. In other words, no set of character traits in endemic to either group. There are good people and shitty people represented in both demographics. There is no correlation between political views and personal character. From there is was a short but painstaking step to really recognize that it isn't the other party that's the enemy. It's the act of objectifying people by conflating what they believe with who they are. A mistake I will make every effort to avoid making again. There's an expression I'm fond of: small change, big difference. (Just ask a barber if you don't believe me.) This small adjustment to my schema has profoundly altered my perspective. It has allowed me to reconcile my fondness for people whose political ideologies I don't subscribe to, and my disdain for people whose political ideologies mirror my own. The ideology is incidental to the equation. The deciding factors are sensibility and temperament. I either find someone to be pleasant, open-minded, honest and logically consistent, or I don't. Period. And I will never again refer to a person as A liberal or A conservative. Those labels deserve the same fate as our friend depicted in the desert. If it was relevant, I would say "a person of liberal persuasion" or "someone with conservative ideologies". Beliefs mean nothing by themselves--it's what is done with them that matters. It's unlikely that a person's beliefs would be accurately encompassed by a single word anyway, and even less so as they change over time. Mine certainly have. Simple. Obvious. Vapid even. Not sure why it took me so long to puzzle this out. But I'll be damned if it hasn't changed my life. --SaintRanger (Former Liberal and current person who holds generally liberal and some conservative views, but who prizes kindness and civility above all.)