Doing things accomplishes things: A theory

The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Don’t like it, then change the Constitution.

We're not gonna do your whole UN civilian disarmament thing again just cause you held onto the Senate are we?
We already went over all this shit a few months ago.
●The New Left doesn't know anything about guns. When they says they wanna ban "ar15s" they mean they wanna ban civilian body armor ownership (New York's "assault weapons" ban that banned no guns but made kevlar more difficult to get...)
●when the left says they wanna ban "assault weapons" they mean ALL semi autos regardless of purpose (The new left's failed house bill that declared all semi autos "weapons of war"...)
●The New Left doesn't care about the the biggest crime wave in [our] lifetimes as long as the drugs, sex slaves and riots keep flowing (you held onto the Senate so someone's still voting for the loot and burn party...)
Get new material.

Democrats haven't generally done a good job explaining the interplay between guns and crime. Crime that doesn't involve guns is (usually) no more than a nuisance. Crime that involves guns can end your life.

In more concrete terms: Having your kid shot up while attending the local elementary school is a bigger deal to parents than having a stroller boosted out of your trunk because you parked on the street and stupidly forgot to lock it one night. However, both of these things do count as "crime."

Take guns away from criminals or potential criminals, you get a safer society. You can breathe a little easier when you wave goodbye to your kid at the bus stop. It isn't rocket science.

Republican absolutism on being pro-gun, like Republican absolutism on being pro-life, is one of those things that places a hard ceiling on GOP support among sensible people.

Your party "fought crime" by defunding the police and banning body armour. During the biggest crime wave of your lifetime.
100,000 Fentanyl deaths a year thanks to Biden's open board's are only a "nuisance" crime because it doesn't help your narrative.

Trump was President when the fentanyl crisis in the U.S. really started to take off, as shown by this graph.

I'm not saying Biden has a silver bullet solution to fentanyl either (deaths continued to rise). What I'm saying is the idea Trump was somehow keeping everybody safe (from either drugs or COVID) as a result of harsh border policy is total baloney.

Crime statistics tell a similar story - the "Biden crime wave" began under Trump. There are underlying factors here that defy partisan politics.

The War on Drugs is one of the most unsolvable issues in America, going back decades. Democrats haven't fixed it, Republicans haven't fixed it, and other countries haven't totally fixed it either - though I do think it's been shown that humane treatment and recovery programs for addicts are a more promising path forward than mass incarceration.

So you mean Biden administration opening the boarders wide and doubling crime and death on our southern boarder IMPOROVED the Fentanyl crisis?
So doubling crime and death due to wide open boarders is a GOOD THING? How does that work?

Now do drug issues and poverty in comparison

Just declare war.

https://youtube.com/shorts/pRqwgQBvIB8?feature=share

wot lol

“Anger is the only thing they left me”

Every rich country has drugs, every rich country has crime, every rich country has minorities and immigrants - though admittedly, Japan and South Korea are fairly racially homogeneous and have been more hostile to immigration historically.

It's not a great argument because Canada (more immigration, more diversity than U.S.) is still doing a lot better than the U.S. on gun deaths.

So what I conclude is that when you stir all of the above together and add guns and you get more gun deaths. Stir all of the above together and don't add guns, and you don't.