If they permentantly banned you in another stream they will do it again here...

how do you define religious bigotry?

Do you condone Moloch worship?

That you're evil. And if you believe that burning children alive is an acceptable practice because "we just gotta tolerate everyone", you are also evil. I do believe Christianity is superior, not as a religious system, but because it is the only way to eternal life. Am I a bigot for not wanting people to go to hell because they believed a false religion?

I'm not the one who said we need to tolerate all religions

banned where?
and I'm pretty sure whoever banned you didn't see it as "nothing offensive"

would you be ok with burning children alive if it were made legal?

why do you get to decide his comment was a violation?

apparently Auservative doesn't

because burning children alive is a real religious practice. So answer the question: if that were made legal, would you be ok with it?

and that warrants a stream ban?

law's that restrict religious practice are intolerant and therefore bigoted

What's that got to do with Auservative?

you just said it was a violation

I'm not the one who said that religious intolerance is a bad thing

So, if you believe that it is okay to restrict immoral religious practices, do you really believe in religious tolerance?

yes... it goes under harassment... you should know that... and oh... you should talk... you've banned people from this site too...and for God knows what... your opinion?

Are you denying that you comment and post banned Auservative?

You issued him indefinite bans with no intention of ever reversing them. Smear Auservative as a leftist all you want, you know he’s indeed a conservative.

Unless you’re going to point to the specific policies that Auservative has that would classify him as a leftist, I’m going to assume you didn’t do any of the research yourself and that you have simply been listening to whatever British tells you. You don’t have to like the guy, but pretending he doesn’t hold conservative positions is laughable.

So you are allowed to make a sarcastic remark and I cannot?

But he did make a remake questioning my eligibility to vote based on a hatred of me for calling out a remark he made as being religiously bigoted...

Do you have evidence of someone making such a threat?

I highly doubt Auservative is a religious bigot, but if you have the evidence, I’m all ears. Still not sure how that would mean he’s not a conservative though.

I would need to have a link to where it happened in order to make a determination, otherwise we’re just talking hypotheticals here.

Sorry, I just have screenshots... But I also have doubts about you reviewing them because the same user gave an indication you were biased in his favor... Also considering some of the bs I've gotten time outs for, I highly doubt getting a fair review...

Well a sob story about how Ser.Donald gives you comment timers and how mods are biased isn’t proof I can act on, so either give me the proof or drop it, because skirting around giving me the proof and accusing me of being biased isn’t doing you any favors.

As I said I only have screenshots... As far as timers I never said it was Ser.Donald... There is more than 1 mod on that stream, and I'm pretty sure only one is "conservative"

"Calling another person's religion a cult I think qualifies as religious bigotry"

No I didn't call BritishMormon's religion a cult, pay attention to what I'm saying or you are a liberal.

What I actually said is that "PEOPLE believe that Mormonism is a "cult"". I believe that mormonism is a different religion.

The difference between a cult and a new religion is that...

A religion belongs to the wider culture; its adherents come and go freely. A cult tends to be counter-cultural, restricting the social life of its adherents to other cult members. The key characteristic of a cult is the axis mundi, the shamanic leader at the center of the organization.

http://www.hopesandfears.com/hopes/now/question/216321-religion-or-cult

Christianity is the sequel of Judaism, I believe that Mormonism is a sequel of Christianity but only had 8 witnesses including Joseph Smith, however Christianity had over 140,000 witnesses (about 144,000 to be more precise).

Joseph Smith one of 8 witnesses of LDS was the sole founder of Mormonism and established it in 1830 AD.

Verdict: IF Mormonism was a cult but still the same religion of Christianity, then it would have been established around the same time, would have had thousands more witnesses, and there would have been a bible similar to the Catholic Bible but with the Book of Mormon combined with the Bible. It would have been plagiarism otherwise if Smith combined the Bible with the Book of Mormon so it is a different religion because the catholics managed to have their own bible with extra books in it.

Three 'Conservatives' referring to 'them darned Liberals' like they were le grande enemy yet they're feuding with each other over trying to shut each other out because King of the Hill is always a delight........................ and so telling,,,

Yeah okay, IncognitoGuy. Lying about Auservative and calling him childish nicknames doesn’t make him a leftist, it just unmasks who you truly are: a right wing SJW who is as hellbent if not more on slandering anyone who doesn’t 100% agree with their worldview or their shady tactics as their leftist counterpart.

Were you the one who reversed the bans then? Or was it someone else?

You admitted you permabanned Auservative, a conservative. Therefore, you indeed have censored conservatives. Case closed.

Because you and I both know that you’re lying about not censoring conservatives and you have the audacity to claim you’re fighting to protect the free speech of conservatives. You’re free to do it, just be honest and own it instead of trying to dupe actual conservatives into thinking you’re actually fighting for them.

are you mocking OlympianProduct?