Wilson: tries to outlaw war Also Wilson: is still an idiot

Woodrow Wilson was the first real Progressive president. He is the one who kicked off the indoctrination into Marxism in our schools. He forced the income tax on us to control us, not fund the government. He forced the Federal Reserve on us to control the means of production. He used the KKK like his own Secret Service. He wrote the book that The Birth of a Nation movie was based on and then he showed that movie in the White House.

He has been a hero to the Democrats for a long time until the conservatives informed them how racist he was.

I'm just waiting for the Democrats to come to their senses and realize that Karl Marx was just as racist as Wilson. So was Che Guevara. At some point their going to have to come to terms that their entire foundation was created by a racist. I can't wait for that day to come.

The day will not come.
The globalist left simply use "racism" as the catch all phrase for those that disagree with globalism.
Stalin purged Jews, ethnic minorities and gays the same as other dictators at the time. China slaughters muslims, Turks & Tibetans for being the wrong color and religion. Communism still gets a pass from the left for spreading atheism & big government.
The abortion industry was founded by eugenicists to control "unwanted populations" and to this day the majority of abortions are black babies. But the racists at planned parenthood get a pass as long as they fight "overpopulation..."
The thing about the globalist left is that they believe in whatever they're told to believe, because they believe in nothing, nothing but power.

Absolutely. I agree with everything you said.

Yeah I hate him. So ticked about Teddy and Taft splitting the vote, it could've been avoided so easily.

It's true, but I don't think that's going to stop them from trying to carry out their vision, even if they don't openly support the figure.

When Teddy lost in the primaries he should have just accepted it but that Roosevelt ego was just too big. That is why his distant cousin didn't follow Washington example (like all other presidents did prior to him, and just serve 2 terms) and served 4 terms. FDR was probably the worst president we have ever had. He kept the Great Depression going until WWII. He locked up innocent American citizens who were of German, Italian and Japanese ancestry. No one in all 3 branches of the government has the right or the authority to lock up innocent American citizens. Well, that is until Obama's 2012 Defense Authorization Bill, which allowed for the indefinite detention of anyone who is "suspected" of being a terrorist.

There are people who just want to be ruled. They would much rather have the government tell them how to think and what to do. It is comforting to them and they will sell you out in a heartbeat if you stand in the way of their dystopian paradise.

imgflip.com/gif/6sluhv
Is it in violation of Tos?

technically no but if it's your stream and you don't want that sort of thing just make a rule about it

Hmm, fascinating. Alright thank you.
Umm, just to add
There is a lot of removal of mods in msmg, now, for a few of them, I know that they said some things (that deserve their removal), but at this rate, there will be no legitimate msmg users as mods. And would conclude to a total sitemod takeover, which, according to Donald (when I asked him for such knowledge), isn't allowed, technically. And that if a stream had no mods or owners, sitemods are only there to help, not give power to another sitemod and keep control.

Now, I only say this because msmg is one of the most popular streams here, and the most lively. I'm afraid that too much control will kill it, along with the accounts that use it. But I also understand that the stream does need some form of control, but there doesn't seem to be a steady balance. If some form of agreement between msmg users and owners can come across, I believe that the final product might form a free willed and safe msmg.

That's true. I don't think it'll ever come to removing even most of the current mods, but maybe a better understanding/agreement could help.
Did you have something in mind?

Perhaps them having the free will to say an opinion as long as it doesn't evolve around a form of threat not murder or suicide. Especially when users give their honest opinions, for example: Spire. And to strengthen certain rules that are absolutely necessary, for instance, the sexual content rule. Just give certain rules a but more leniency.

Those users are so used to the original many before sitemods that they don't understand. But certain users like me, are used to both sides, but still tend to struggle a little. So I think my idea may bring a little more closer to many users, considering that they aren't fans of the "sitemods in control" idea.

Well technically speaking there is a difference between a subjective opinion (ex, "spire isn't my favorite") and a statement about the objective nature of reality (ex, "spire is a pedophile")
I think the only real issues driving the bans is people telling people to kill themselves, people accusing users of pedophilia, and racial slurs.

What do you think should be more lenient?

Of course the "kill yourself" and "spire is pedo" shouldn't have leniency. But I'm saying like, if it's referring to an actual fact about a user, post, or group, then just leave it be, unless it becomes too much.

And I honestly think that a few others like, "rant posts" (which in msmg are 95% satire most of the time), should have leniency. A majority of the users there find them funny.

the concern is that people would spread rumors. That's why we want you to bring stuff like pedo accusations or whatever to site mods. It's not like we don't listen, how do you think that no sexual content rule got put in place?

what're rant posts?

Well the sexual content rule isn't being enforced at all. Which frustrates me.

And rant posts are usually jokes based on true things about other users, I tend to ask for permission from users, but others just post it randomly. Its easy to spot the jokingly funny ones from the ones that are actually meant to insult another person.

The rule is referring to like someone's personal sex life kind of stuff. I think that's been pretty well enforced. If not flag it or send me links in the future and I'll take care of it.

I guess it'd just depend on the content of said rant.

I do think that the rule overall should be enforced towards everyone, including non personal, but alright.

I suppose it does

Sorry for the paragraphs

high IQ tomfoolery

Do unban me from MSMG

no