THERE SHOULD BE A SPECIFIC ROLE THAT THE MODS AND OWNERS CANNOT REMOVE IN THE EVENT OF AN INCIDENT WHERE AN OWNER REMOVES ALL OTHER MODS AND OWNERS BEFORE DELETING THAT HAS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF ADDING MODS AND ONE OWNER BACK TO THE LIST, THEY CANNOT REMOVE THEM. THEY CANNOT ADD THEMSELVES TO THE LIST AND CAN ONLY BE VOTED OUT TO BE REPLACED BY A USER EVERY MONTH OR WHEN THE USER BECOMES TOO INACTIVE. THE ONLY THING THIS ROLE WILL BE ABLE TO DO IS ADD 5 MODS AND 2 OWNERS TO GET THE BASICS UP. IF THERE ARE MORE THAN 5 MODS OR MORE THAN 2 OWNERS ARE IN PLACE, THEY CANNOT DO ANYTHING ELSE BESIDES TEMPORARILY LOCK THE STREAM DOWN OR CHANGE THE STREAM DESCRIPTION. THEY CANNOT REMOVE MODS OR OWNERS UNLESS 5 USERS GRANT THEM THE POWER TO REMOVE ONE OWNER. OTHER THAN THAT, THEY CAN APPROVE POSTS. A VOTE FOR (INSERT POSITION) BUTTON SHOULD BE WHERE THE STREAM DESCRIPTION IS AND USERS COULD INPUT THEIR USERNAMES IF THEY WANT A CHANCE AT THE ROLE. THE OPTION TO VOTE A USER OUT WILL SHOULD ALSO BE AVAILABLE. IF YOU ARE VOTED IN AND YOU ARE AN OWNER OR MOD, YOU LOSE YOUR MOD STATUS. A SEPARATE VOTE TO GRANT THEM THE ABILITY TO DELETE ONE OWNER SHOULD BE POSTED AS WELL. THE ISSUE I SEE WITH THIS IS MAINLY PROGRAMMING AND IF KIND OF IDEALIZES THE USERS AND THE WEBSITES CAPABILITY.. BUT IMMA THROW IT OUT THERE ANYWAY