suika (by me on roblox)

Looks cool

Could you draw me? No is fine

SPI also wanted me to draw you, however i am waiting since now for the ref sheet she promised me.
Unless you do have a sheet or is going to make one the answer is no.

I only want my face. Not full body. Is that ok?

Yes.

I was sent to give you the image of jaws

Yes?
Although you aren't obliged to do so.

Did you get the pic?

His pupil is white btw

H

bruh big toothy mean ass 💀💀💀💀

🤨📸

:0

Don't hurt yourself that way.

You idiot can’t think of a comeback so you direct the insult back to me. Scum.

(Replying to "It’s anthro so it counts as porn. If you drew a regular animal without clothes, then I’m totally fine with it, but drawing an anthro like this is unacceptable")

So, you're saying if they had a pair of underpants and a bra, it'd be fine?

No, they need to be fully covered

I still don't get why you take such issue with it; it's not like anything is being shown, and they're not in any sort of vulgar position. There's much worse out there; this is just harmless fun.

But this art might make some people feel uncomfortable, and if a boomer saw this, he’d have no faith in the new generation.

Well, a lot of things make people uncomfortable. Generally, this is fine, with furries, and, again, has been discussed at length before. As for boomers, they'd have no faith in this generation regardless.

I think it makes most people; normal people uncomfortable

May I ask what possible evil am I-
or rather, we in this stream-
are doing in this world?

1. "Unholy", and yet you come up at me like this. Quite ironic, y'know.
2. It doesn't even contain anything sexual

1. I can do what I want
2. NUDITY!!!

There's... really no reason clothes are required here.
From a societal standpoint, they really have nothing they particularly need to cover
From a scientific standpoint, they wouldn't need it
Humans developed clothes for the sake of both modesty and homeostatic equilibrium. If both are already covered in this scenario, it technically wouldn't mecessitate wearing clothes. Therefore, it's not really nudity in the NSFW sense as much as it is nudity in a fashion/design/aesthetic sense.
This is something that's been discussed at length by furries and non-furries alike. Otherwise, take, for example, some pokémon that have a furry-esque aesthetic (Zeraora, Lucario, Zoroark, etc.) They're completely SFW, despite having no clothes.
I understand and appreciate your concern, though, and I assure you I've taken this line of reasoning into consideration.

Ok and?

And so there's really no reason to mark this as NSFW.

Yes there is. If it is furry porn, it must be marked as nsfw!

What is that? Sorry I don’t speak stupid

This isn't porn; it's just art of a character. I feel I've been quite reasonable and comprehensive with my explanations. I understand your concerns and I am trying to address them in a semi-professional manner.

It’s anthro so it counts as porn. If you drew a regular animal without clothes, then I’m totally fine with it, but drawing an anthro like this is unacceptable