Weird white people please shut up.

If you care about food, you should care about climate change. Crops don’t tend to be resilient in 130 degree heat waves. See: Death Valley

Show me the crops in death valley. You prove my point...weird white and boring. They don't grow crops in death valley.
Because you are white and boring let me help...
Crops are gown at whole foods snd harvested by little dwarves at night.
Sit this one put champ you are way in over your head.

If Death Valley-style 130 degree heat waves start happening frequently outside of Death Valley — in areas currently used for agriculture, for instance — what result?

Consider this sequence of photos and take all the time you need

It's always IF with you weird white people. And if jfk had not been assassinated we would have been in Vietnam sooner. And if Nixon hadn't done Watergate he would not have resigned. And if and if and if. Again sit this one out son u r in way over your weird white head...

The only one bringing race into this is you bro. The earth doesn’t care a flit. Lol.

You don’t like the word “if” — would you prefer the word “when?”

Asking when will your predictions ever come true? Kid in the 70snu boring weird white people said we were entering an ice age. U called it global warming and then that fizzlednso nownots climate change. Weird white and boring.

Some scientists predicted global cooling and they were wrong.

Other scientists predicted global warming… and they were right!

That’s the simple version. The slightly longer version is that for a couple decades, global temperatures weren’t rising quite as quickly as predicted, leading some scientists to speculate that there was another phenomenon at work that was cooling the planet down.

It turns out there wasn’t actually anything pulling in the other direction, global warming just took a brief pause for unknown reasons.

However, some media outlets took the story and ran with it, publishing sensational covers about “global cooling” that turned out to be dead wrong. And now here we are, 40 years later debating that same kerfuffle when the data have long since moved on.

Your take is an interesting one during a week when temperature records are being smashed around the globe and forest fires are raging.

There is no real difference between the terms global warming and climate change. Both are true. The world is warming and climates are changing as a result.

No proof it's warming when assessed over a proper time period. It's all reactionary....

If some were wrong and some were right that means they have zero consensus...it means they have data and then they can spin it based on funding and politics
Ain't much funding for, establish that global warming, cooling, change is unsupported.
The worst climate issues are in blue states. I need Gavin Newsom talking about climate issues like a need a wh ore to teach me about chastity...
End of discussion.

If 10% were wrong and 90% were right, that doesn't mean "no consensus," that means a 90% consensus.

This chart pretty much reflects exactly that.

Keep in mind this pie chart terminates at the year 1979, which is the latest year that the "global cooling" conjecture had any logical backing whatsoever. See again chart above

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/07/22/weather_channel_founder_tells_brian_stelter_cnn_drank_the_kool-aid_on_climate_change.html

And another...

That 99% has been debunked...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/uhenergy/2016/12/14/fact-checking-the-97-consensus-on-anthropogenic-climate-change/

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/article/putting-the-con-in-consensus-not-only-is-there-no-97-per-cent-consensus-among-climate-scientists-many-misunderstand-core-issues

Read. Learn. Evolve.

Or stay silly...

Kid...again...this is unfair. You are a 20 something Sociology major and took maybe 2 science courses in high school. You are way out of your intellectual depth as are most in your age group. Sit this one out champ you are publicly embarrassing yourself with your overt lack of intelligence.