So, as I see it is that abortions are the murder of unborn children. For f**k's sake, it is an infant child with a heartbeat. It is living. If something is living and you kill it, is that not murder? Libtards don't understand that unborn babies are not the frogs they would slam onto their sidewalks when they were children.
The controversial part of my view is that if the woman carrying the infant is very unhealthy, impoverished, has been raped or is a victim of incest, the option should be available to have an abortion.
This has happened twice with me but the damnedest thing is that liberals, or who ever is in support of abortion, turns pale when it comes to executing the rapist.
I suggested that if a woman chooses to abort due to rape then the rapist should be executed automatically based on her decision to abort. Refusing to abort does not pardon him from execution, the decision will then be made by a trial. They went hysterical saying you can't kill him. Needless to say I was flabbergasted. I mean their reasoning for allowing abortion due to rape is that she won't have to deal with the trauma of bearing a child born of rape. Yet they are apparently fine with her living with the trauma of knowing her rapist is alive and may be released in a few years. This happens alot, it's how repeat offenders exist.
Go figure, they can kill an unborn child but not a rapist.