Goodfellas Laugh

Gonna testify he heard it from a friend, too?

You shouldn’t have such a grim outlook on his under oath testimony, maybe he will be the first Republican to testify that actually exonerates the orange traitor. Who knows?

If he is repeating what others told him...it is neither exahneration nor evidence, it's rumor.

We will find out tomorrow

Unlikely, he was in the room for everything. He was on board with everything trump did for four years. That is of course until trump wanted him to be a part of trumps post election crime spree. Loyal, true conservative , pro trump counsel. So you’re already starting the deflect and disparaging of this guy? Sounds like you already know how bad this is about to be for trump and his supporters that keep pretending that there is nothing to see there. Good luck!

I need no luck...I have no horse in this race. If he has fiest hand accounts that cam be cooberated, let's hear them. If he is going to tell us what someone else told him...who cares? That's not proof but rumor.

Well the whole reason they called him back to testify is because the other witnesses have repeatedly stated that he was there , in the room or on the phone during the worst of the president’s behavior. I think he will verify what has been said but I’m biased. I think trump is a fool. But who knows, he may come in and say everyone else is lying at worst or just not being fully honest at best.

But I also think Biden is a joke too, but he hasn’t tried to overturn our democracy. So until that happens, I don’t waste my time complaining about him.

After looking at your creations, it’s clear your horse in this game has lost due to Pat Cipollones testimony. Pro trump, first hand, in the room witness that did not dispute any other folks testimony AND did not plead the fifth even one time. Jump ship while you can, even rats are smart enough to leave a sinking ship.

Behind door hearing - You have no idea. And, look all you want at my memes. I am an American first, a conservative second, and a libertarian third. If you see an over abundance of memes making fun of or critical of one position over others, it is because through my filters they are the most out-of-wack with my filters. And my positions will change as factual information changes. If a person never changes a position, they are either an entrenched willfully uninformed demagogue, or a fool.

If you’re an American first and a conservative second then you’d be running from the trump brand like so many other conservatives are right now. It’s ok to admit trump was a failure and a con and still be conservative. I don’t subscribe to either party too much, I am just an American that knows that trump is a traitor. I’ve voted blue and red depending on the candidate. And that’s what intelligent and informed Americans do.

Well I suspect your position will be changing . The initial information released is clear enough, the witnesses told the truth, trump hijacked the Republican Party in an attempt to become Americas first dictator. And sadly, a fair amount of gop members are ok with that

Oh don’t fret, it was all taped and will be made public. But the only part that matters to any Americans is that he verified all the previous testimony, and he never pled the fifth

Again, you know nothing of what was said. Why do you pretend you do?

Even the Washington Examiner quotes Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) as saying "Capitol riot investigators do not call witnesses to "corroborate other witnesses".

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jan-6-committee-member-says-witnesses-do-not-corroborate-other-witnesses/ar-AAZqb1S?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=1963b607f4774c3384225bb06b3c2a5f

The whole point of having witnesses testify under oath is so that everyone’s testimony can be verified lol. And when all your witnesses testimony align, you can be pretty confident that you have reached the truth.

And she also said that Cipollone did NOT dispute any of the previous testimony AND did not take the fifth.

She said they never asked if he said what was alledged. How is that verification? Corroboration is a synonym for verification. She states they DID NOT as for corroboration.

Ouch, I’m assuming you’re ready to stop defending the orange traitor now?

And when the man that was in the room verifies what she said as a first hand eyewitness, that pretty much clears it up.

Lol, she specifically said that he did not dispute or deny anyone else’s testimony. And she also said they learned a lot that day from him. So, he confirmed everyone else’s testimony AND gave them new information. Cmon man, stop with the nonsense. Your boy is cooked, and a fair amount of the gop went along with his coup. We will learn even more on Tuesday and Thursday this week, you and I can circle back to this conversation after then. Let’s see who is reading what Zoe said correctly.

When she repeats what she heard (OR WHEN ANYONE REPEATS WHAT SOMEONE ELSE SAID) it is not evidence - it is hearsay. I've clarified Trump is not "my boy" and don't care what comes out other than TRUTH! NOT HEARSAY. NOT RUMOR. FACT!

It is time to end this dialogue. You are obviously not interested in finding facts, just a narrative fitting your beliefs.