The men in the Supreme Court put the ball in your court.

How dare you assume their gender

For the record, we're not, lmao.

But yeah, definitely gunning to recognize the rights of the unborn though.

Read Clarence Thomas' comments about further flips. "The concurring opinion from Justice Clarence Thomas on Friday even suggested that the Supreme Court should "reconsider" other past rulings, including Griswold v. Connecticut, a 1965 case that granted married couples the right to buy and use contraceptives."

They can deny that they would, just like they denied that they would not overturn Roe v. Wade. But that would be a lie.

Nah, we were all pretty clear about wanting to overturn Roe V Wade. People like you say that, and I have no clue where you get the things you say, I'm not saying no conservative ever said that they didn't want to overturn Roe V Wade, but like, all the conservatives I know and listen to were very open about that and always have been. So you're listening to the wrong people then friend. Also, repealing Federal "constitutional" protections like what Thomas is talking about, is not repealing the right to anything, it's just leaving it up to the people of the states to more directly govern themselves on matters not mentioned in the Constitution...kinda like what the constitution says to do.

No, no they are not.