Imgflip Logo Icon

Only Big Brother can protect our First Amendment!

Only Big Brother can protect our First Amendment! | image tagged in free speech,big tech,conservative,party,fires,back | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
99 views 3 upvotes Made by Slobama 2 years ago in IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS
11 Comments
4 ups, 2y
TWITTER USERS SUPPORTING 8 LONG MONTHS OF BURNING DOWN BLACK CITIES... TWATTER TRUMPY TAKING TWO HOURS TO CONDEMN RIOTS BLAMED ON THE RIGHT. | image tagged in oh no anyway,fat trump golfing | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
The joke here is: (and you'll never get it, cause CNN will never explain it to ya...) is that the left wing has been claiming for years that twatter doesn't censor speech based on political party.
But some jackass southafrican troll says he's gonna buy twatter and reveal their top secret censorship algorithm and you totally loose your minds.
Twatter was so terrified of being caught with their pants down that they lifted their shadow bans on Republicans. Republican content and followers doubled overnight, proving the long "debunked conspiracy theory" that you guys aren't afraid of hate speech: You're afraid of disagreement.
I don't care what twatter does. I would never use it, again. Social media is a plague. But it's still hilarious how terrified the left is of people straying from the narrative.
The Ayatollah is free to spew his threats to level Israel, because Islamic terrorism is ok. But Trumpy falsely claims your 8 long months of looting and burning down black cities is "mostly peaceful" and supports "charities" to bail that scum outta jail and he's off the interwebz.
Oh wait. That was you guy too. Nevermind. Carry on. 👍
[deleted] M
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Captain Picard Facepalm Meme | image tagged in memes,captain picard facepalm | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Literally nobody is forcing Twitter to platform illegal content, it’s literally illegal for them to keep it up. As someone who claims to be a lawyer, it’s pretty shocking that you aren’t aware of this.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Texas free speech law | image tagged in texas free speech law | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
https://qz.com/2058465/texass-new-social-media-law-is-a-clear-violation-of-the-first-amendment/amp/

Hate speech is illegal in certain contexts, like at work. You can’t call your co-worker a Dirty Jew (or whatever) without subjecting yourself and your company to liability. Don’t like it? Take it up with the EEOC, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, not me.

The Texas law would force large social media companies to platform and normalize the kind of speech that could get you fired.

This particular law is not gonna affect Imgflip, since I’m pretty sure the site doesn’t have 50 million U.S. users per month, but if you worked for Twitter or FB, this would take direct aim at your ability to do your job and make the difficult judgment calls needed to keep users safe.

Hamfisted government regulation of private companies — this is the kind of stuff libertarians are normally against!
[deleted] M
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
https://i.imgflip.com/6hyhoi.gif Hate speech is not illegal, it’s literally the reason the First Amendment exists. Yes, there are certainly consequences for your speech such as potentially losing your job, but it’s not illegal. I can post the nastiest things online and as long as I don’t commit defamation against specific individuals, it’s perfectly legal. Are there consequences if I were to take those actions? Yes, but it’s still legal. And you bet your ass I support regulations that restrict Twitter and Facebook’s ability to censor speech they disagree with. They have taken over as the de facto town square and must be forced to accommodate free speech as such to preserve the integrity of the First Amendment. Even if smaller sites like Imgflip were forced to comply, I would still support it. Cry about it, call me a fake libertarian, whatever, I support regulations on massive multinational corporations to preserve the rights of the people. Heck, I would even go a step further and side with Faucahontas of all people and call for the breakup of the big tech companies into less monopolistic entities.
0 ups, 2y
Maybe the big socials do need to be broken up or reformed in some way. The idea that Zuck, unelected and unaccountable to anyone but shareholders, can fiddle with the controls and change what billions of people around the world see on a daily basis is frightening. It’s real dystopia-level power.

But the Texas law isn’t it. It’s so not-it that it would actually make things worse.

Also, it’s Texas. California could pass a conflicting law tomorrow, and then what? Something this huge needs to be regulated at the federal level, not that I really expect that to happen, given the fact almost nothing big happens at the federal level anymore, for… *gestures vaguely* reasons.

That said, as the Texas law applies to companies with 50+ million monthly users, if it’s upheld, then it could be a roundabout way to get these companies to voluntarily break apart to the size of approximately 49.99 million users/month. But then what? Then they’ll just go back to doing what they were doing before, but only on a massive rather than a giga-scale.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Background: Conservatives have been convinced that they are a persecuted class whose viewpoints are being shut down by Big Tech. In fact, the opposite is true: when rigorous studies of the largest platforms like Facebook and Twitter were made, they found conservative content actually gets a boost.

The dumbass legislators in the great state of Texas recently passed a law purporting to crack down on this illusory problem by imposing daily fines on social media companies who censor content or users based upon their “viewpoint.”

What is “viewpoint”? Good question! The law, of course, doesn’t define it at all.

Well? Hitler had a viewpoint. He had a viewpoint that Germany should expand into its East, purge the Jews, homosexuals, other undesirables, and all other people found there, and allow the master race of Aryans to assume its rightful mastery over the world.

Despite Hitler’s miserable failure, and the unfathomable and undeniable human devastation left in his wake — which should have put an end to Nazism in any sane universe —there are still a disturbing number of useful idiots today who adhere to this lunacy.

The Texas “free speech” law, if upheld, would permit anti-Semites, Holocaust deniers, Neo-Nazis, and every other kind of terrorist to run wild on mainstream social media, exposing everyone and their grandma to this crap, rather than being forced to huddle with each other in the cold dark depths of the Dark Web where these basement-dwelling edgelords belong.

It won’t do to simply say Hitler and his acolytes “aren’t political.” They quite obviously are. Anti-Semitic propaganda stating that Jews secretly run the world and that “Aryans” should rule the world instead are indeed political statements, no matter how half-baked and counter-factual.

The Texas law would entitle such vile beliefs to equal protection as factual mainstream Republican or Democratic opinions about current events and topics.

And it would totally wreck the moderation systems of platforms like Imgflip, to the point they’d have to decide to either allow themselves to be hijacked by anti-Semites, or else shut down entirely and allow no one to speak.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
They don’t allow and YouTube has had many many waves of purges, that’s why there’s bitchute and breadtube. Most of popular social media’s seem to clamp down on anti war, vax crap or conspiracy crap like hunter Biden’s laptop that turned out to be true
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
It’s not well-known, but the “free speech” platforms have their own content moderation, too. They might choose differently on some topics, and that’s why they exist, and ought to exist.

However, the Texas law will threaten the independence of any platform that is unfortunate enough to be targeted by anti-Semites and other terrorists, which is of course, all of them.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Sucks to suck but I still don’t really care lol, if one company won’t allow another will be made.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Shadow ban, demonize, add age restriction or account restriction
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
https://imgflip.com/memetemplate/198026098/YouTube

Old template of mine
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Conservative Party Ronald Reagan and that’s a fact