Defend the contsitution!

If a 2-day old embryo is a person, then:

—Tell me its name?
—Give me its Social Security number?
—Give me the contact info for an insurance company that will issue it a life insurance policy?
—Let the pregnant woman start collecting child tax benefits right away?
—And drive in the carpool lane?

There are good reasons that our society (and societies dating back to premodern times) have treated birth as a critical moment — but let’s see how red states’ upcoming experiments in favoring religious dogma over common sense shake out, I’m sure it will turn out fine.

At least you're in good company...

Throwing away the insights of science because bad things were done in its name would be as silly as throwing away the insights of Christianity because of the Crusades, the Inquisition, pedophilic Catholic priests and Southern Baptist ministers, etc.

We’re not talking partial-birth or third-trimester abortions (always had the right to ban those under Roe v. Wade), we’re talking about whether the state can prosecute a woman for murder before she even knows she’s pregnant.

No state has a bill to prosecute women for murder before they know they're pregnant. That's like the argument coming from the fake news media that if Roe vs Wade is overturned, condoms might become illegal...
Of course, California has a 4th trimester abortion bill in the works, if you wanna pretend to care about that. Oh right. The outrage only shows up if it fits the narrative...

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/04/california-not-poised-to-legalize-infanticide/

It’s not true but ok.

Griswold v. Connecticut is the SCOTUS precedent that guarantees the right to use contraception. Decided a few years before Roe v. Wade, it’s part of the same constellation of precedents that is supposed to keep government out of our bedrooms.

And yes, radical religious nutcases are already talking about dismantling Griswold too. Why not? They can get speedy service from this majority-Catholic SCOTUS. Decades-old precedents are obviously on the chopping block, so if you’re a theocratic Karen, why not swing for the fences?

This is why I don't generally bother with your links.
Do you know what that link says?
Imma give you a hint...
It says everything about the 4th trimester abortion bill that the articles I show is correct. But Faqcheck.DNC.chinessegovt.biz claims that "judges could never possibly confuse a decriminalization of afterbirth abortion with a legalization of afterbirth abortion."
In other words: it does say exactly what I think it says but could never be enforced because liberal judges aren't that stupid. That in no way disputes my claim.
I'm gonna give ya a challenge: start reading your own bullshit instead of taking CNNs word for it.

Slick argument. If all of those things are what makes a human a "person", then you know that "person-hood" becomes a privilege that is granted or rescinded by the government. Being a "person" subsists in being a human life, up until now which was believed to be endowed by a Creator with inalienable rights. Not having an SS number doesn't make an unborn child less a human than an illegal alien crossing the Mexican-American border.