Imgflip Logo Icon

Stand by for Rationalizations from the Radical Right.

Stand by for Rationalizations from the Radical Right. | PAYTON GENDRON; KYLE RITTENHOUSE 2.0; IS HE A "FINE YOUNG MAN," TOO? | image tagged in politics | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
218 views 2 upvotes Made by LarryCaird 3 years ago in politics
7 Comments
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Wow,,, that’s a stretch, even for you, Liarry.
A court tried him and he was acquitted of all charges, not guilty.
I thought you respected the decisions of the US Judicial system.
Tsk tsk tsk
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I am sure that Joseph Rosenbaum's and Anthony Huber's family and close friends are comforted by your support of their killer, who also traveled outside his community heavily armed to take their lives. The similarities I make are between the perpetrators and their crimes.

I would add that OJ Simpson was found "Not Guilty." But neither he, nor Rittenhouse are innocent. I respect the laws and the courts. That doesn't mean I have to support murderers or forgive them.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
F**k both of them and f**k their family and close friends, too.
Joseph Rosenbaum was a deranged felon, a registered sex offender, a convicted child rapist who spent most of his adult life in prison, where this violent and deranged criminal belonged. While he was locked up he committed many many violent stacks . The day Rittenhouse defended himself from this deranged asshole , he had both an open domestic violence case and a bail jumping case against him when he bled out and joined Satan in Hell,
He was caught on camera acting aggressively that evening, setting fires, arming himself with a chain, and screaming “shoot me, ni**er!” at armed citizens. According to an eyewitness he said that he would “kill you motherf**kers, motherf**king ni**ers and cutyour hearts out.”
Anthony Huber also had a criminal history. Court records in Wisconsin show that Huber was convicted of disorderly conduct in 2018 as a domestic abuse repeater and was cited for possessing drug paraphernalia. He was also found guilty of a felony for strangulation and suffocation, domestic abuse. He was also convicted in that case of felony false imprisonment with a dangerous weapon, domestic abuse.
None of the assholes that attacked Rittenhouse were the saints that his parents and friends make them out to be. They were violent antisocial scrotes that this country is better off with out them alive.
Why in the hell would you defend these two?
Rittenhouse was there to help and Rosenbaum and Huber were there to burn, loot, and murder.
You are deplorable.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Nobody deserves to be executed by a vigilante. Rittenhouse had no idea who he was killing when he pulled the trigger. Your hatred is noted.

I guess what you are saying is that if any criminals were among those killed by Gendron, he should be nominated for Sainthood?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
He knew that they were attacking him and trying to do bodily harm to his person.
Look,Liarry…a jury found him not guilty based on the testimony of one the people that Rittenhouse shot(but, sadly lived), video evidence that supported his innocence and showed clearly that the idiots shot were intending to do great bodily harm to Rittenhouse or kill him. Again, we are better off without them alive. Your hatred is noted.
You can guess all you want, but that is ridiculous, since I actually wrote what I wrote, nothing else. I also in previous comment have indicated that the Buffalo shooter should be arrested, jailed, charged, tried, convicted, and incarcerated for the remainder of his pathetic life.
Do try to pay attention, Liarry.
1 up, 3y
As I said extreme right wingers will attempt to rationalize killing by right wingers. Like you, this guy was radicalized by disinformative right-wing extremist media. Most normal people don't bemoan the fact that a victim of one of their heroes survived being shot by him.

Your characterization of the legal system as it played out in the Rittenhouse case, is stilted. Innocence was not established. The choices for the jury were that the evidence and testimony either did or did not support a charge of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In his case they decided that although he was armed and the others were not, he might feel threatened. Reasonable doubt, resulted in a "Not Guilty," not "innocent," finding.
0 ups, 3y
*Attacks, not stacks,,,stupid autocorrect
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
PAYTON GENDRON; KYLE RITTENHOUSE 2.0; IS HE A "FINE YOUNG MAN," TOO?