If you knew anything about how to form an argument, posit a hypothesis, research data, show your work, and intelligently defend your conclusions then you’d be doing that instead of making ad hominems and claiming the person without reason is myself. That isn’t how reasonable people treat those who are ignorant. They inform and move on and if they truly feel there is no way the person they are informing has any intellectual honesty or integrity; they would not engage.
The people who frequently believe themselves to be the smartest person in the room yet fail to produce anything worth saying besides sarcastic or patronizing responses; do not contribute anything to their personal image of portraying themselves as intelligent. In fact, reasonable people can even admit they may be wrong.
I may even be wrong about you. Yet given your propensity to be easily offended and to lash out with the intent to offend; I am still doubtful.
In fact, I would dare say that if you do respond to this message with more of this behavior; then you will unwittingly be proving me correct.
Or you could prove me wrong and say something your opinion or state a fact without involving me at all. It doesn't even have to be about this topic. If you can construct an argument telling me something without directly referring to myself; I will give you one upvote.
If you really think I’m not worthy of such intellectual integrity, then you can - of course - not respond at all.
So, what is it going to be?
Intellectual honesty and prove me wrong,
Continue with the ad homenims and prove me right,
Or forfeit the discussion all together and still prove me wrong.
Your choice.
Caption this Meme
