P e o p l e .

nah foo, send me that subreddit you got the good shit

Uhh this image is from 2weeks ago so I mighta forgor but I think it was r/oddlyterrifying

Th- omg -

People w a n t to know what it's like to kill.
This is proof.
Everyone has thought about it at one point,,, so when you look at it like t h i s , , you could say that the only thing stopping, God knows how many people, from killing is .-. the law.

They lack balls.

This experiment is really e n c o u r a g i n g it, it makes killing seem f i n e .
Therefore, we c a n n o t use it to conclude that everybody wants to kill 🤓

But moral people aren't supposed to e v e r think that killing seems fine.

So aren't the results of this experiment sort of saying that what these people were thinking was, "Well right n0w killing seems fine, so why don't I try to see how it feels like?" Meaning that people dO want to know how killing feels like?

When you give them that choice, yes.
If you label a bottle with "Cyanide that doesn't kill", everybody's gonna want to drink that.
If you label a wemen with, "Killing her seems fine", everybody's gonna want to,,,

Of course. The fact that they even considered the choice, though.
I mean. I really don't blame them. Being given the chance to do something that is almost always considered a sin .-. would sound appealing. People want what they can't have. People want to be different, but not excluded.

What would y o u have done to her ¿

I find this experiment pathetic, it doesn't say a n y t h i n g about people.
People are n o t "ugly from the inside" and shit.
I wouldn't even have watched this shit happen, I wouldn't even read about it cuz I'm not curious.

I would appreciate the artist tho, it's all about h e r . Nothing more than that.

But it d o e s . That many people hurt her, just cuz they could. Just cuz they could. Doesn't that say something?
I don't think they're ugly for wanting to kill her. They're just ._. human .-.

yes.

a w w w w w w w 😭😭 lovye.
Will watch it together. bye.

s t f u * & ^ $ % ^ & * #

YES
I mean. ok👍 idc lol
g o o d n i g h t .

It is.
No dodgy camera angles, like we get in shower scenes. Just pure gore.

Of course, we could.
You got a new kink, babe¿ Watching shit together?

u h
u h
u h
I mean it's not really
n e w

but u h I don't know kind of cuz like you're sharing emotions and it's more interesting and less scary and uh uhh uh

You should watch Martyrs.

IT'S BEEN ON MY WATCHLIST FOR SOME TIME.
But I heard the torture scenes are really hard to watch and stuff and I saw a few scenes and was kind of (*&^%$#$%^&*

Wait
What if we
what if we
what if we watched it
together .-.

He was a school principal.
He took kids home for whatever reason and raped them and probably choked them to death. put the bodies in acid later so they'd,,, disappear.

He killed a hundred children.

I forgor 💀 how exactly he was caught. But it took a long time cuz no one suspects a school teacher, and it only happened cuz it was a kinda a rural kinda illiterate kinda place i guess.

The case was the first of it's kind, and I f**king love it when courts show actual human emotion.
They a n g r i l y sentenced him with a hundred death penalties and said it should be carried out with the same chains he killed the children with, and his body should be cut in a 100 pieces and burnt in acid.

THAT IS SUCH A COOL DEATH SENTENCE. LUCKY MOTHERF**KER.
Well I shouldn't say l u c k y .
BUT WOW.

Ye. Just got to know bout him.

What'd he do .-.?
I mean I know he killed but like,,, how'd he kill his victims?

One has a heightened sense and is usually self-aware, this is good.

One can't cope with loud neighbors,,,
this is the ancient primitive apeshit.

do ye know Javed Iqbal¿ really cool guy.

Is he a serial killer ?

No. Neighbors are brainless shits.
Mr. Bundy, or Fritzl and psychopaths and habitual killers are interesting, cuz they don't kill because they couldn't cope with bad neighbors. Killing's just incidental, they want other things.
that's what's interesting.

The point is
they're not
n o r m a l .

No, Nar, it just means they're a brainless shit.
It's not going to be Ted Bundy or someone of the mind, it's just the neighbors who couldn't cope and killed the next-door people for partying too loud, people do that.

The interesting people do and think a lot more than making people die.

But Ted Bundy and that neighbor both have that one thing in common that makes them so f**king interesting .-.

B U T , you or me or no one except for these people knows what goes through their head when they do this. W h y are they choosing to not be normal. I want to understand. stfu.

L

._. baby ._. You can kill for self-defense, you can kill murderers and terrorists and rapists, you can kill in wars.
But you can't kill out of spite.
Yes, we are supposed to think that people who kill are unfit to live with us and must be made to stop living with us, either by detaining them in isolation or by making them stop breathing.

I would love to talk to someone who's killed someone out of spite. Wouldn't you?

What's wrong is what society convinces you of being wrong ._. that's how right and wrong works.
Nothing stops you from raping your siblings, but you don't usually rape them, do you? Does someone ever tell you it's bad?
ye, society. Even tho it doesn't physically exist, it's a part of oUr mind. We create a "society" in our mind, that tells us what's right and wrong ._.

If a person is raised in a normal household, and kills someone, there's something wrong with the person.
They're not an artist, or a philopher.
Artists and philosophers understand and respect boundaries, they cherish shit they can think about and can't do.
They express it in other ways than doing the exact same shit that the law's asking you not to do, things like, making American Psycho, or creating a Pessimist ideology. Killing is ancient, primitive,,,, no matter what your motivation is.

.-. not directly. Incest isn't the same as murder, though.
O o o o h .

*philosopher (bozo + can't spell + kys)
OOOOOOH. So I guess, instead of killing someone you should channel that "wanting to know the feeling of taking someones life" energy into making a r t .
WAIT. BUT THEN. LIKE. ALL THESE PEOPLE WHO'VE MADE SHIT LIKE . - . SHIT LIKE HANNIBAL AND SHIT,,, ABOUT MURDER AND SHIT,,,,, have all these people thought about killing someone????????????????

Yes, Nar. They've thought about killing people, and because they're normal-bred in normal society, they never thought of going out and murdering someone,,, it never occured to them.
But a curiosity led to them creating a masterpiece.
Just like unpopular opinions are injected into society through comedy, instead of killing people who don't believe it.
We're not f**king apes now, we don't kill anymore.

O O O O O O H H H H .
Imagine having the creativity to do shit like that ._.

"We" .-.
So the,, people,, who d o , aren't p e o p l e , huh ?

Of course they would. Doesn't say anything about people.
It's the same people who also make the laws and develop culture,
if you remove the law and all the culture, this is what you inevitably get,, not exactly violence, but simple perversion and random shit, it's just random shit you'd do when you know there's no consequence to anything.
There's absolutely nothing motivating their actions here, they're not even "being themselves" or anything,
they've just been told that there's no consequence to their actions here, which is the only wrong I see. Whatever they do is just an effect of this,,, primary evil.

F**K I JUST F**KING TYPED SO MUCH SHIT AND THEN I F**KING RELOADED F**KJST76R89&^%&$e

JESUS F**K. F**K. I HAVE TO RETYPE. F**KKKKKKKKKKJUYT5R4#

It helps cuz then you're clearer about stuff and take lesser words lol

UGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.

ALRIGHT. Damn. I didn't think about that. If these are the same people who are constructing how we live, do you think that makes society f**ked up?
You're saying that their actions shown in the experiment are e v i l , yet you're contradicting tHat by saying that the experiment doesn't say shit about humans. This image is literally explaining how if humans c o u l d do evil shit, they would.
And the fact that they don't even need a motive to do stuff like this to a completely innocent women,,, people are defying the f**king morals t h e y made for t h e m s e l v e s .-.
Just because there are no consequences, doesn't make it right. Isn't that how humans are supposed to think? Integrity and shit.

shut up.

I wrote as much as you.

Bad example.
Falling WOULD kill me. this is physical.
Hurting the artist would NOT put me in jail. this is moral.

These are the same people who used to murder, they decided murder is bad, they're the same people who made laws forbidding murder.
Now it's a rule, everybody wants to break rules,,,, but no normal-bred member of society does.
If people are curious, it's because there's a rule against it, not because they have a craving for murder.
You'd have to be an artist or philosopher to want to find out how killing feels like, most people are not.

S H I T *&^%^&* bad example, bad example. I forgor.

Why would they think taking life away is a good idea in the f i r s t place.
But do they not wanna break the rules because they genuinely think it's wrong or because society has convinced them that it's wrong or because they just don't want to be an outcast?
Never said they craved for murder. just said that they were curious.
What would you call a person who isn't an artist or philosopher but wants to find out how killing feels like anyway . ?

I'm saying that their "evil" is an effect of her primary evil.
She removed everything that makes people civilized and demonstrated that none of their actions have consequences,
t h i s is evil. This is all wrong.
Of course it's going to make people do things that you might think are bad,
but it's not really `bad` cuz the artist has told them that nothing's "good" or "bad".

You take a case where morality and ethics are deliberately thrown out as an experiment,
and you apply that to normal society. This is wrong.
Every conscious being is CAPABLE of violence,
they don't internally crave violence because they're bred in a cultured society, not in an inhumane experiment.

But heres the thing ._.
If someone tells you that jumping off a 6942000 foot cliff wOn't kill you, you probably still wouldn't jump off the cliff, right? So why would people still do all this shit, even if the artist removed the sense of morality and ethics? It's like .-. like they were waiting for a chance, or for something like this to happen just sO they could do all this shit. You can't blame the artist for the audiences actions.

Of course every conscious being is capable of violence, we acknowledge that every day when we turn on the news or read a f**king article. But it's not about whether you're capable or not, it's about if you're willing to hurt someone in the first place.
Being bred into a society that forbids things like murder, I think that unintentionally encourages people to curious about what killing someone would be like. Not saying we should remove all laws cuz that'd make everything better, but I am saying that it's just in human nature to want to do things that seem wrong. Now if we were bred in an "inhumane experiment" instead, killing people would probably be the norm. Not nearly as big of a deal as it is in this version of society.

why they undress her tho-

Why do you think .

bc ppl are disgusting