If you are then you fell for it!

They should just clean it up as they did with Mark Twain's work...

Why?

Why not?

Historical value and intent. Your reason?

So there was none with Twain's work?

Are you saying there was no historical value and intent in Mark Twain's work unless it's "cleaned up"?

Oh... so you finally see their double standard? WOW

Well, I gave you a chance to clarify your position but you're either actually supporting censorship or you're too wrapped up in the idea that you can be sarcastic in text form without any indicator.

It's simple. There is no justified reason to ban these books or remove them from required reading given their historical value and their intent.

Obviously, not all censorship concerns you... thanks...

By attacking me and not the argument, you've forfeited this debate and accept my valid points.

Sorry for showing off your hypocrisy... again...

"Sorry for showing off your hypocrisy... again..."

Actually, by admitting they should censor these books like they did for Mark Twain; that means that you are saying that:

"Obviously, not all censorship concerns you..."

So unless it's your voice being specifically silenced by social media (which is not the same thing at all, nor is that actually "censorship", Abby_Normal.) then it doesn't concern you that this is happening.

It's much more important to discuss Goldberg's error than fix the actual problem in our education system.

But again, thanks for admitting I had a good point with your poor attempt at... well, actually I dunno what you were trying to do? Expose my hypocrisy because it... makes this... not so bad? I've tried seeing what vague message you're trying to make but in the end it just seems like you're trying to make me make your argument for you. Then, when I refuse to do so, you make it personal.

See, attacking the arguer really hurts whatever point you're trying to make. If you were even making one.