Img_Flip isn't exactly the best place for arguments with any kind of complexity.
Let me try to break down what I'm saying:
1) You wrote the terms of the "compromise". The terms should have been debated and adopted by Congress. All Congress gets to do is vote yea or nay on a pre-packaged set of terms that were put together by a single person with that person's set of prejudices. You think it's a fair compromise, but that doesn't mean it is. That's only one man's opinion. Having a compromise worked out by the two opposing sides in Congress has a better chance of being an actual compromise, then your single point of view.
2) You tried to find common ground between those who don't want IG back at all and those "who think he should just get a slap on the wrist.". This is a false dichotomy. Here's why I think that:
2a) IG was banned for a month for a violation of the TOS, buy having alts, which he fessed up to. This was fair because he violated a previously issued set of rules. The ban was a month and he serve his time.
2b) IG returned and was immediately set upon by those who don't like him and was banned again for for 2 days for a language violation. Truth be told I'm not really clear on why this ban was enforced (this should probably be looked at), but okay, it was only two days, let's agree that was also fair. He again served his time.
2c) he returned again and was almost immediately perma banned for reasons that are completely unknown and uncommunicated. This is where the injustice is most egregious. If it was by whim with no due process, then we are a despotic government and power can be taken by the Powers-that-be at anytime for any reason.
So the point here is this is not a slap on the wrist. he was punished he served his time and unless there is a sufficient reason to have perma banned him, he has been treated unjustly.
3) Your "compromise" appears to me to simply be adding additional sanctions to the punishments he has already served, which simply adds to the injustice that has been forced on him. How many more punishments will the powers-that-be add to his membership? Moreover, if he was banned unfairly, then he should simply be immediately unbanned and his full rights to membership restored.