Now they're gaslighting us...

Clear (non ethanol) or gtfo
Ethanol takes more energy to produce than you'll ever get back out of it.

You can't get non-ethanol in most gas stations. Just 90/10.

Rural locations tend to have it, but bigger cities not so much.

I can find it, but I have to really go outta my way, so I don't bother. Driving way out of your way to get gas is counterproductive.

And you pay a lot more for it, too.

I hear it's good for extending lawnmower and chainsaw engine lives. But I'd lose too much money hunting it down.

The ethanol gas absorbs water. Which, of course, doesn't burn.

Really only paying about 10% more. Ethanol has about half as energy per volume, so actual cost is only 5%. Don't want polar solvent around cold metal.

We shouldn't be paying 'more' for something that is basically an adulterated product.

Ya, no kidding! You're paying more through tax subsidies even before you put your card in the pump.

Story time some time ago A guy named Donald Trump was in office and everything was a whole lot better.

This is a joke

Average politics too meme, except from liberals that likes baphomet for some reason...

They should call it how it is the Liberal Stream.

I think they say that in the description, so close enough.

Close enough isn't good enough! #ChangePoliticsToosNameToLiberalStreamBecauseTheyShoudCallItHowItIs

The person who wrote this is probably a filthy rich libtard who has no problem buying $75 worth of gas

Or just someone "werking from home" (wink wink.)

Ye, that would make sense too

I wish 89 and 91 only cost 10 and 20 cents more
where I'm at it's like an extra 30 cents just for 89

The price difference between 87 & 89 and 89 & 92 octane in [my state] is 50 cents. So I would be paying like a dollar more for high test. Not that I'll buy any...

1. I've BEEN using the "cheap gas."
2. It ain't cheap anymore
3. They're definitely out of touch if they're writing this article.

3. The average monkey believes that garbage.