my first political mem

i don’t agree with that scale very much but i won’t get too much into why unless you want me to

go ahead

well basically there are a few reasons:
1) Nazism is higher on the authoritarian scale than Communism, when both are the epitome of authoritarianism, and if one had to be worse than the other, it’s communism, not Nazism. Nazism has its place in history’s greatest evils because it was an authoritarian plan that was instantly aggressive and clear about what it wanted. Communism, on the other hand, has also been very aggressive (look at its death toll compared to Nazism), but it’s actually been far more sly and manipulative. Their supporters take over education in many countries and convince the mob that their idea is good for the people easiest to victimize, thus making the successful feel guilt-tripped into supporting them, and the unsuccessful riled up into voting for them so that things will be more “fair”, a promise they never deliver on. They kill dissenters just like Hitler did, and even take over countries when the government is failing, just like Hitler did. Lenin and Mao both did this with Russia and China. An example of the slyness pulled off by these people is that Stalin actually instigated World War 2 by intentionally allowing and even encouraging Germany to sack Poland when he could have stopped it, because he was trying to get Germany to fight England (because England always protected Poland; it was how they entered WWI). Also, one of FDR’s advisors was a secret spy for Stalin, who used FDR constantly until a few months before FDR’s death, when he finally figured out Stalin was not on his side.

2) Nazism isn’t rightism, that’s just a lie made up by leftists so they can pin evil on rightists, since everyone rightly understands Hitler to be one of the greatest evils in history (though if you look back into the ancient days, Hitler-like jerks were actually quite common). And Mussolini (the Italian dictator in WWII) was a devout Marxist, placing him on the far left.

3) Anyone on the far left that says they’re libertarian doesn’t know what leftism is, and they’re probably a liberal that doesn’t know they’re not leftist (because leftists took over the Democrat party from liberals some time ago, which is why some liberals are now voting Republican. Basically we used to have a majorly liberal vs conservative country, and now the majority is leftist vs liberal). Liberals and conservatives tend to be the ones who want the freest country, and the left does not have such agendas.

i can’t see too much else because it’s blurry, but those are some

As Anonymous stated, Mussolini was a socialist initially but quickly became disenchanted with socialist internationalism and egalitarianism which he considered to be a contradiction of evolutionary principles. Thus, he founded political fascism which synthesized the working-class edge of socialism with militant nationalism and contempt for those who undermined the civil order of the nation(In Mussolini`s mind, blacks, mixed-race individuals, communists, anarchists, liberals, social democrats, moralistic conservatives, the disabled and those who put faith or conscience before the good of the nation were ‘enemies of State’ and were shot dead by his Blackshirts). Mussolini also placed an emphasis upon “blood and iron” meaning ancestors were to be respected and technology was to be used to advance national interests and eliminate ‘the unfit’.Also of note unlike later fascist regimes Mussolini was not particularly anti-Semitic and rejected scientific racialism at least initially, he was still a cruel, warmongering sociopath, however. He was so cruel and unpopular outside his fascist base in fact that the Italian people publically hanged him in the street towards the end of World War II. He was the first Axis leader to die with Hitler following a few years later.

wdym by “evolutionary”?

The thing is that many of those groupings that Mussolini claimed “undermined the civil order of the nation” were similar to the ones Marx felt similarly about: blacks, mixed-races, anarchists (unless you’re talking about godless anarchists, since the strong push for atheism was heavily influenced by marxists), or any type of liberal or conservative that wasn’t communist or socialist (btw he himself said socialism wasn’t that far off his idea). Also the whole technology thing is something that very many communist dictators have done with their countries (especially North Korea).

One of the reasons Mussolini was hanged was because most Italians had never wanted to involve themselves in WWII, something which he ignored, and certainly weren’t a fan of the side he took (since it was the warmongering sociopath side), and finally they got tired of it and revolted because the idiot declared war on America after we joined the war because Japan decided nuking Pearl Harbor was a good idea.

Nazi dictators didn’t hate socialism because of disagreement, it was more out of selfishness. For example, Hitler didn’t want Moscow to be the global capital because he wanted Berlin to be the global capital. Hitler and Stalin had a pact for 3 years during WWII btw, (which Hitler eventually broke once he felt Russia was of no further use to him).

By the way, Mussolini wasn’t a Nazi, he was fascist. Mussolini didn’t have an idea of racial purity or supremacy, just Italian nationalism. Mussolini was the father of fascism, Hitler harnessed Anti-semitism to gain power, creating a new form of fascism with added hatred.

Where's "I follow the law but would still gladly kill my enemies if I could"?