Must deflect

I don't see you addressing the point, either.

There is nothing more to be said except , are you of Draft age ? Have fun in Eastern Europe

So, you'd rather us not go to Ukraine to defend them?

They're only doing it to keep the payola flowing

So, you'd rather us not go to Ukraine to defend them?

We have to , thanks to Biden weakness and incompetence

Biden has nothing to do with it. Russia was pushing in on Ukraine when Trump was in office. Trump stalled giving Ukraine the funds needed to buy weapons with which to defend themselves. Whether or not Biden is in office is inconsequential to Russia's mounting forces on the Ukraine Border.

I respecc you. You’ve got balls of aluminum alloy to post this.

Yeah, it is pretty low-hanging fruit I must admit.

Seems to me you've got two kinds of people.
1) Those who still believe the election was stolen
and
2) Those who come to misdirect away from the fact that Trump broke the law (again.) Seems to me that you're right. No rational person is in here except for you, the OP.

Oh yes, Trump broke the law for the ten thousandth time, according to useless hit piece books with nothing but unsourced BS claims. This time it'll be real, I'm sure

Just because you have denial doesn't mean he hasn't broken the law. You decry the corrupt politicians yet at the same time you choose them as your leaders. You're very confusing.

Because you know, the right wing has been saying "Trump din do nuffin." since day one... Instead of something to the effect of... "We'll see what the evidence says."

Evidence ?
Any?

Evidence of what, exactly? Be specific.

I see you got your Biden crackpipe.
Didn’t waste time hitting the rock, eh?

I'm sorry, Biden crackpipe?

Yes, you are.

I asked a question of clarification and you respond thinking that I asked if I was a Biden crackpipe. I don't know what this is about, but if anyone has anything to do with crack, I'd wager it's you. Try to follow along in the conversation next time.

No, silly… I agreed with first part of the sentence.
Try to read between the lines next time.

Also, you mean tell everyone here on imgflip that you just crawled out from under a rock and you haven’t heard of the White House plan to spend 30+million dollars on distribution of crack pipes to inner city druggies?

Well yes, I did apologize. One does that when there's confusion and seeks clarification. So, why the need to reaffirm it? Do you need me to be sorry?

Anyway, that's not really important.

Biden doesn't live in my head rent free, so I don't follow what he does... much.

I went digging into this because I try to avoid the news as it just wears me down with all of its sensationalism. I found the claims that Biden was distributing crack pipes. With skepticism, I decided to go to the primary source text and discern for myself what is being said.

Apparently, there's a grant being given for substance use disorders which are aimed at the effect of reducing risk and potential death for substance abusers/users who are at risk for overdose. So, as I learned, it's aimed at helping people get out of Drug Dependency. I did see that the "crack pipes" as referenced are not mentioned anywhere within the text of the grant. The closest thing that's in there is "Safe Smoking kits/supplies." I checked through the rest of the document, it didn't state what was contained in them.

I referenced the crack pipe claim. Nothing in the document.
I reference Psaki's claim of lip balm and rubbing alcohol. Nothing in the document.

So, I'm curious as to what a safe smoking kit/supply is, sure. Could be any number of things, but the verbiage of the grant is highly ambiguous.

In fact, there are points in the document that strictly say you may not interface with patients and use grant funds to help with detoxificiation/drug use.

"SAMHSA grant funds may not be used to:
...
- SAMHSA grant funds may not be used to promote the use of, purchase, prescribe, or provide marijuana or treatment using marijuana. See, General Provisions under Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, Public Law 116-260, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Division H, Title V, Section 509 21 U.S.C. 812(c)(10) and 841 (prohibiting the possession, manufacture, sale, purchase or distribution of marijuana).
...
- Provide inpatient treatment or hospital-based detoxification services. Residential
services are not considered to be inpatient or hospital-based services.
..."

Maybe you could show me where it is in the document?

To me it sounds like Right Wing Hyperpartisanship.

https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/grants/pdf/fy22-harm-reduction-nofo.pdf

You mean to tell everyone here on imgflip that you just crawled out from under a rock and you haven’t heard that the fanfic White House plan to spend 30+million dollars on distribution of crack pipes to inner city druggies isn't true still for the nth time?

Yet, you still believe the “Steele Dossier “ and that the Donald flushed documents down the toilet.
You’re so gullible
BTW… the WH crawfished when the word got out about the crackpipe giveaway.
Good night, Goober

What on Earth are you babbling about?

I, like you, and the rest of this zany comedy troupe, do not know what this "Steele Dossier" thingy actually IS. (Although someone once finally told me 3 or 4 months ago after 5 years of asking that it's the super duper secret transcript to the Pee Pee Spray Tan Tape, which of course makes no semse, of course)

Night? It's dawn over your side of ye olde pond, innit, m8?

Here's the document for the program they're talking about.
It actually says that it doesn't supply drugs of any kind nor can it use funds for such. It says that it has "safe smoking kits/supplies." but doesn't elaborate on what that is.

So, they're making it up; it's in their head. Perhaps THEY should lay off the crack pipe.
https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/grants/pdf/fy22-harm-reduction-nofo.pdf

I mean this is literally pro-life stuff. I just don't get their stupidity. How they double back on their own political values.

I already looked it up before, not that any of the nonsense from the cult makes sense to begin with.

It's deliberate.
Cheesy fantasies are more entertaining than the simple - and boring - basic truth to a certain demographic.

Stealing the election would do that for normal people.

You believe it was stolen... STILL?! LMAO

Wasn't she questioned by a Republican led-committee and they found no evidence of wrong doing? Oh that's right, but her emails.

So upset that people are picking on the Crackhead , I remember over 5 years of whining about Trump . Biden's losing the support of the Media which will give you Snowflakes something new to cry about

Yet, all we've heard about is how tyrannical of a dictator Biden is when he can't even remembers his name. Yet he is working feverishly to destroy this country and bring communism, socialism, and fascism to America.

Okay that made me laugh out loud reading that. But hey, that's the rhetoric of the right. Anyway. So, don't tell me that you aren't whining about Biden, when he can't go for a day without being on politics front page with 50+ votes.

Now on to your hypocrisy.

According to your (the collective your) behavior, one of the following is true:
Moral bankruptcy on "whining about the president."
Either A) You couldn't hold up to your own standards - hypocrites.
Or B) Since we (the collective left) did it, that must make it okay for you - hypocrites.

Saying "you guys did it." Is not the own you think it is. It just makes you look even worse and reaffirms that your party is no better than mine.

Crying? Like this?

False.
Trump's attempts to steal the election via an asked for 17,000 pulled out of a hat Georgia votes, getting swing states to overturn results, Giuliani's crafted fake Elector ballots for at least 6 of those states, Pence on Jan 6th, military seizing ballot boxes, or an all-out military coup, failed.