The internet would be a better place if children where not allowed to use it.

Yep

Just curious, but why is snowflakes one of the tags?

Because most people who are under 13 in the internet tend to be liberal snowflakes.

Ok.....

You're worst parent ever and most kids abusing parent

Bruh am a teen and also am not abusing anyone. Keep being toxic and ill report you.

Ok im will stop being toxic

Thanks

*I'm, do you acutally know the difference between 'am' and 'I'm'

Yes i do, no need to remind me that am smart.

Well, at least you took a long time to learn the difference considering you said 'am right' many times

Am 18.

i am 13

No!

Why not then?

Because he don't allow websites to childs that under 13
So he worst parent ever

He.....might not be a parent first of all.
And second, thats literally what he said. I honestly agree, the internet is ruining the younger generations with all these expectations.

"Because he don't allow websites to childs that under 13"

Incorrect, i said children who are 13 and under should not be allowed to use the internet, as 13 is still a pre-teen.

Second, am not a parent. But i am aware that access to the internet is ruining younger generations, and even ruining the internet itself.

And listen to me
Not to GoldCrusade

Meh
I'm picking the side that I agree with thanks.

no

Don't listen to him. He is just a cringe 8 year old that cannot handle criticism.

Oki doki...

HOW YOU CALL ME?!

cringe 8 year old

Because you are cringe

Cringe 17 year old

Defending the snowflakes, how pathetic. Also your cringe.

*you're

damn

Says the person who cannot handle common, non-scientific words that are primarily used when talking to non scientists (most people)

Ever heard of common names? You know Reptiles=Reptilia, Birds+Aves, Placoderms=Placodermii

And fish is a common name for either anything that lives in the ocean or something that lives in the ocean and has certain properties

The mods deleted my answr because they though it was homophobic (Social Justice Warriors). Anyway:

That might be because it was

It was not, i would never post something like that. Now your lying about me, your an SJW.

I won't know for sure unless I know what was in the comment

Person above me sucks and have less points than me!!

Proof?

I'm have 185847 points

I have more

XD
YOU HAVE ONLY 56567 POINTS
YOU'RE SUCH A CLOWN

Nope am not a clown

You lied
You don't have more points

No because i hate his request
Flag this post
NOW!

No can do bud...

Told you this kid was immature.

I can see that.

How about no?

No

yes

Stop *calms down*
Can you support Ukraine for win the Russia Invade?

What?

Russia have invaded ukraine
Please support her (Ukraine) to win

ok, but stop being cringe

Also
IM FLAGGED YOU

You need to get some grammar classes kid.

Др0чильня блять

Fun fact: People should have the right to own guns.

Fun fact: People (most of which are non-scientists who would be confused by scientific terms unlike scientists, who would apparently be confused by the word 'fish') should have the right to say the word 'fish'

Why should they say fish? And besides we can add common names for the classes. So fish is not allowed.

I'm not saying that they should use it, I'm just saying that the word fish should be allowed (at least when the distinction between scientific classes or whatever rhgjreb, rkjhjgrebioufbn and the other ones are is not required) to say it and people will still use the word fish, no matter if you want it removed. Plus what if people want to include multiple classes when describing something that could be called a fish?

Wut?

You really want people to think that 'am right'

I'M RIGHT