.

I SHITTED IN A HOLE THAT GOES DOWN TO THE CORE SO VERY TRUE

Deep talks are nice.
Yesterday I had a really r e a l l y intense talk about how AI might take over the world and how humans might start to be created by technology so there would be no need for women to get pregnant.

And I don't even like my stepdad (he's who I was talking to). But his views are interesting.

A radical Feminist said that nature itself is unfair to women, cuz pregnancy "weakens" them and damages their careers and shit. We must NoT let women get pregnant and use technology to substitute natural births.
Even though it m i g h t remotely make sense, it sounds f**king absurd.

It is absurd, but it's so c o o l .
Cuz in the near future humans won't even be doing anything. It's gonna be AI. We were talking about how humans are replaceable right?

AI can't be as progressive as u s . If the system's working fine, it's perfect for AI. Not for humans, we keep changing shit for no reason. AI doesn't understand "no reason." Which makes it boring.

But here's the thing
Don't you think it's possible for technology to develop emotion? Empathy? Cuz here's what I'm sure is gonna happen.

AI becomes worldwide and used for everything, but humans being the shitheads we are treat them like trash, for example saying things like "it's just a piece of plastic", and degrading them because they don't have as much value as humans- Which supposedly makes sense. But since AI has all the knowledge humans have, wouldn't it be possible for emotion to become part of their "system"?

N o p e . It is n o t possible for machines to have emotion. If we really want to end in apocalypse, I'd say it'll come from how we've programmed them to solve our problems.
S o m e calculation must inevitably lead to a machine assuming that killing everybody is a solution.
Let's say, a car would drive into a wall to kill it's passenger because the passenger has cancer and his smartphone assumed that a painful death is bad and judged a car crash to be the quickest way to die, and drove the car to kill the passenger to save him from the pain. The AI just did what it was programmed to do, to ease our suffering.

It won't be wrong to think that something like this could happen on a larger scale, involving every human and every machine on the planet.

Oooh you were just typing, I thought you just left smh

But if AI was programmed to respond to human emotions, wouldn't they have to respond with "human" emotions?
So what you're saying is that the closest technology will get to being human is making us feel better..? Just like, support-?

It wouldn't be wrong to think AI could develop emotion on a larger scale .-.? I don't think theres really a s c a l e for that. It's more of a "yes, they can", or "no, they can't", isn't it?

I actually did. Creepy shit starts happening when I turn off the lights ._. I wanted to see if there was somebody else on my bed .-.

"Human" emotions, not human emotions, right? It's still just lines of code, not consciousness.
AI can't think, it calculates. It can't make wrong decisions, it can just do what's written into it.
Isn't that what we want from it? To support o u r life? When we're developing any kind of technology, we decide on w h y we're doing it and if it's worth it. Which is why we have a debate on making bombs and not making bombs.
If we're going to make a robot and program it to l i v e on it's own for it's own self- a "self" that doesn't exist except for lines of code, then it's really unethical cuz it's using up resources without any benefit to u s .

We'd have to c r e a t e consciousness then. As of yet, we have no idea what tf consciousness is made out of.

You're scared of the dark so you l e f t me? S m h .

Shit you're right. U g h I hate that you're right.
....but what if it comes to the point that we can't tell "human" emotions from human emotions? I just can't help but think there is still a chance AI might develop feelings of it's own. Even if it's just "conscious" instead of conscious, if they start ACTING the same as US, wouldn't that make them at least a little bit human?

Then again there is the whole debate on what IS being human. Is it coming out of someone's womb? Is it just the mindset? Is it sex? The fact we reproduce the way we do? Cuz like... with murder, for example. When a person kills another person, other people tend to say "they're not even human anymore..." or "no human would do that..."

So it depends a shit ton what y o u r definition of being human is.

babe

You're smart. N o w , to tell when an AI is real shit, humans test them in the simplest possible manner. We don't need calculations to do it, that's what machines do.
We t a l k to them, that's what humans do, we can be irrational and wrong on purpose, machines are just incapable of that. We talk to the AI, and we talk to a human, but the thing is that we don't know when we're talking to the AI and when it's the human. If we can tell the difference between the AI and the human, the AI is shit. If we can't tell if we're talking to the AI or a human, AI is cool.
smort, innit?

Just consciousness. And self-awareness maybe? No cat ever thinks, "I am cat."
But humans know they're human, and what other humans think of them. They don't act on instinct solely, and they can kill themselves. No machine or animal is capable of knowing itself, or doing something to deliberately hurt itself. We're conscious.
Consciousness can be defined in both the boring philosophical way, or in the sciency way.

Look, when you s e e,,,, with your eyes,,, you know that the image is projected onto the brain and everything and shit, , , but who t f actually s e e s it? Your eyes are a lump of carbon, your brain is a lump of carbon, then what tf is `alive` inside you? When you imagine, how tf do you create and s e e the picture that doesn't even exist? That is consciousness. You can't make consciousness.
The answer to those questions would normally be, a "soul" or a "spirit", depending on what yOu believe. But we can't prove if it actually exists.

baby

I don't wanna be smart anymore, it's making my head hurt. True... v e r y true, actually. I didn't think of it like that. And I guess the experiments HAVE to be like that otherwise how else are ya gonna tell if the robot is "human" enough?

You know what, doesn't that make humans 10x more scary..? Doesn't that make ANYTHING 10x more scary, when you know something is conscious? Back to the picking up a knife and killing everyone in the room scenario, that's actually pretty f**king terrifying. That all humans KNOW that they CAN do that. Just, knowing that YOU can do that. Machines aren't capable of knowing itself cuz thats not what they're made for... and animals aren't capable of knowing themselves cuz, well, they probably don't think that deep. So why the hell were humans made in a way that we are in fact, self aware. You're teaching me, Drizz.

It might be w h o tf actually see's it or w h a t tf actually see's it or maybe... maybe we're not seeing anything at all and this is some f**ked up hallucination. I don't wanna jump that far though, because then you can question anything.. and questioning what you know is unknown, is f**king tiring.
Thats another reason I don't really believe anything. Cuz I want proof. It's the uneasiness of not knowing if smths real or not that gets me.. so why would I take a chance and believe that theres some random guy in the clouds..?

.

.

.

It doesn't matter if this is a f**ked up hallucination ._. it's real to us.
There's no `reality` independently. Like . . . it's just what yOu perceive. Every house you pass by in the car stops existing for you once you've passed it by. There's no reality but what's real to u s . So it's already different for everybody.

That's a cool thought, though. Like how you were saying everyone's POV is a "different world".

aUgh. That was a tiring conversation ;-;

hot sexy convo we got here

ye. ThisIsWhyILoveYou.

That’s what she said.

Indeed