Imgflip Logo Icon

might as well keep it democratic (F1 Note: I am the solution)

might as well keep it democratic (F1 Note: I am the solution) | OK GUYS TO BE FAIR IG DOESN'T NEED TO BE ON THE STREAM TO MOD NOR DOES THE CONSTITUTION ADDRESS; HE CAN APPROVE IMAGES FROM APPROVAL QUEUE
BESIDES TRYING TO RETALIATE WOULD BE AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE, THEN HE'S LOSING MOD; SO WHY NOT HAVE ONE MORE PERSON TO APPROVE IMAGES?
IF HE REMOVES HIS BAN THAT'S ALSO AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE; WHAT DOES CONGRESS THINK
LOSE MOD OR KEEP IT TILL HE ABUSES IT? | image tagged in fafa | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
158 views 4 upvotes Made by League_of_jay 3 years ago in IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS
fafa memeCaption this Meme
9 Comments
4 ups, 3y
You'll have to take this to the supreme court. I've already talked with a meme lawyer and a stream ban is considered absolute. Unless you've got something better than "he might not abuse mod again." We need to let this go.
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Honestly it’d be better for him — and people would respect him more — if he did something unusual and out of character for him, which is accept a punishment without fussing or trying to weasel out of it or trying to ban the stream owner.

Approving images will just interfere with having a clean break, one month to reflect on the actions that led him here, and how to change to be a better leader going forward, if he wants to be.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
https://i.imgflip.com/636e4q.jpg I agree he should have quit while he was ahead.
0 ups, 3y
So then you think his mod should stay removed
[deleted] M
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Putin Facepalm | SERIOUSLY? | image tagged in putin facepalm | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
If I can be brutally honest here, the whole argument that you should keep your mod after being stream banned is utterly moronic and deserves to be thrown out of consideration due to being an utterly stupid idea. Seriously, who sincerely believes that a person who has shown they cannot be trusted enough to be allowed to participate in a community should be allowed to moderate it? I highly doubt anyone would be arguing I should keep my mod powers if I got my account deleted, nor would I ever make the argument anybody who’s been banned from any of my streams should be allowed to moderate them. Why is this even a discussion?
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
If I can be honest, this whole 'thing' between you and him smelled like a bunch of bullsh*t from the start. A "What came first the chicken or the Egg" thing. You got the upper hand but I wouldn't go making yourself look like a saint here. The biggest mistake he made was getting caught doing things people that he was accusing others of doing. Big stupid cringy mistake. And he can't participate and (likely) won't win President again. You (and others) acted like big babies about his "meme chat voters" which if you are honest with yourself was a pretty novel idea and nothing illegal with your Constitution. If you think he can't be Mod because of some weird "trust issue" (when there wasn't a problem with his modding before all this happened I would wonder if your position isn't more based on personal reasons.
1 up, 3y
Well said
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
But you all are going to do what you want. Opinions are like butt-holes everyone had one and they all stink.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
Let him keep his mod I'm guessing this thing has ruined him for the next election anyways, am I right? Why keep kicking him when he's already down?
fafa memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
OK GUYS TO BE FAIR IG DOESN'T NEED TO BE ON THE STREAM TO MOD NOR DOES THE CONSTITUTION ADDRESS; HE CAN APPROVE IMAGES FROM APPROVAL QUEUE BESIDES TRYING TO RETALIATE WOULD BE AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE, THEN HE'S LOSING MOD; SO WHY NOT HAVE ONE MORE PERSON TO APPROVE IMAGES? IF HE REMOVES HIS BAN THAT'S ALSO AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE; WHAT DOES CONGRESS THINK LOSE MOD OR KEEP IT TILL HE ABUSES IT?