When the Washington Post gives a SCOTUS judge 4 Pinocchios, does that mean that Armageddon is on the way?

Thank you!

If you think fake news isn't the enemy of the people... look no further then this story. I supreme court jacked up on hoaxes and conspiracy theories is a danger to our very democracy!

Child death rate from covid is < .02%.
Point zero two percent
Let’s just round to zero and I am correct in principle.

Lol...I want one

And that doesn’t change that she was talking out of her ass…

It kind of does, actually! If the only thing she got wrong was the number, it puts a lot into the general sense of what she was trying to say.

It’s one thing to be wrong on numbers, but she wasn’t even in the same zip code. I know, in your mind, she can do no wrong, but damn man, at least get your nose out of her ass on this

No, in my mind, she was talking about something that most definitely is factually happening in an extremely serious way. That's more than being in the right zip code, that's getting everything right but the phone number.

After reading your posts, I can see how you could loop around to base your reply that way.

3,342 vs 100,000. Yeah, that’s close…

Again, record breaking numbers that hospitals do not have the capacity to handle.

And they're children, in case nobody's mentioned that yet.

Stop it with the "emotional plea" for the "children". They're in the hospital...and will leave. You have provided nothing to substantiate the severity you claim that is happening. You people literally have to lie and distort information to make your point. The spike is a minimal number of people and the death rate is falling with the new variant. Lying is all you people have now to keep this fear porn going, and when WaPo calls you out, you know you're on the losing side of an intellectual argument.

Please note, by the way, a complete lack of a decline on death rate recently. That should set off alarm bells in your head that you've made a mistake.

It won't, but it should.

You're the one trying to dismiss a serious issue because one person didn't use the right number at a particular time.

You're the one trying to justify a justice who lied. She not only got it wrong, she was so far wrong as to entire the twilight zone. Children are only 2% on average of the population that are hospitalized...for any reason covid related, much less than that are "serious". The hospitals are struggling under a holiday spike that is mostly adults...98% of patients. Children are still the least vulnerable to the covid and are more vulnerable to the common flu. They are also being hospitalized at alarming rates after having been vacinnated.

She didn't lie, she described a situation that is happening and misquoted the numerical statistic that backs it up.

By the way, if you even bothered to actually look into this, the hospitals have been very clear that this is being driven by the children who are too young to be vaccinated. Which is why that the CDC chief recommended that the vaccination age be lowered as a matter of some urgency AT THIS EXACT HEARING THAT YOU CLEARLY HAVEN'T ACTUALLY LISTENED TO!!!!!!!!

YOU CLEARLY DON'T CARE, SOMEONE TOLD YOU TO ZERO IN ON THE 100,000 NUMBER AND IGNORE THE ENTIRE CONTEXT.

Almost 0% of children are dying from this. The child death rate from covid is < .02%. "Chill the f**k out." --CDC

You clearly don't care that the CDC numbers don't back up your phony argument. Period. You only care about the narrative.

Yes, they do. Record breaking hospital admissions beyond the capacity of the hospitals.

And they're children.

CDC numbers.

And test, still no where near the number that she claimed. Another swing and a miss.

Child death rate from covid is < .02%.
Point zero two percent
Let’s just round to zero and I am correct in principle.

Tell that to anti...and just watch the head explode. He's hell-bent on defending the lie and can't back a damn thing up with actual facts.

Annnnnd...I just realized I replied to the wrong comment. smdh. lol

No biggie :)