adolf hitler

That's odd because vaccines were quite distinctly NOT required in Nazi Germany.

Consider the forced medical experimentation and sterilization of masses of people by the Nazis and you will better understand the meme.

tuskegee was institutional racism, a conservative hallmark.

SMHID!!!

You're missing the forest for the trees. Forced vaccination is having something forcibly inserted into your body and injected with an unwelcome substance. I'm sure you understand why this is wrong.

conservatives should stop politicizing the vaccine and take it.

damn stuta. you have taken it to a whole new level of stupid. you are brainwashed and a victim of the liberal´s lies. all evidence and logic point to the fact the vaccine does not work. not only does it not work there are many risks that come with it. it doesnt stop side effects, stop you from spreading it, or stop you from getting it.

tell that to the doctors.

LOL SMH!!!

SMH

Exactly what Octavia said, and on top of that the Nazis directly stated in the historical record that they were against vaccinations.

As I have already shown to Octavia, the forcible injection of a substance into people against their will is wrong.

antivaxxing because it's a hoax is more wrong.

SMH

....you're still talking about vaccinations which the Nazis very distinctly did the opposite of forcing on people - they forced people NOT to get vaccinated. It quite suited them to have deadly diseases run rampant in crowded conditions. Have a think as to why that might have been.

You're still missing the point. The Nazis stripped individual liberty away from the people and forced many people to undergo medical treatments against their will. This is precisely what a vaccine mandate does. You (and Octavia) are seeing only the contents of the injection when the actual issue at hand is whether *any* mass injection may be made to a populace that doesn't want to get it.

Yes, the content of the injection matters. That's why the Nazis were so dead set against vaccinations. They WANTED the mass death and disease and they forced people NOT to get inoculated.

No, it really doesn't matter. You're completely missing the point of being *forced to undergo medical "treatment" against your will*. It's a fact that the Nazis did that, and it's scary.

It's also scary that some people evidently want to ignore this reality.

Except in this situation, it's not something you put in quotations - it actually IS a treatment for deadly disease.

That's why the Nazis didn't want people taking it and in fact forced people not to.

"Yes, it's a treatment for a deadly disease. When you take it, you're 50 times less likely to end up in hospital, and the 5 million deaths worldwide could have been 100,000 deaths if we had the vaccine at the start. That's 4.9 million lives that would have been saved.

Try getting THAT deal from Hitler."

I see that you're trying to justify authoritarian rule on the basis of perceived lives saved. Your scenario of saving lives presumes mandatory vaccination, of course, and the vastly more dangerous problem that you have now created is that you are justifying the position that governments may forcibly conduct medicine on people against their will. This is a recipe for disaster as it violates individual liberty and conscience rights.

This doesn't even address the question about the unknown, long-term effects of repeated vaccine injections. Perhaps to you, we're just supposed to "trust the government". Unfortunately, it's kind of hard to trust a government that has already stripped the people of their individual liberty and conscience rights.

... DID you get that deal from Hitler?

You didn't, did you?

Let's consider your statement and ask a simple question: is it really a "treatment for a deadly disease"? The survival rate of the virus is around 99.5% overall, and even higher than that for younger people. In fact, if you look at the latest CDC data, you'll find that in the U.S., for people ages 30-39, COVID has killed only 1 of every 4058 people. So much for the claim that it's a "deadly disease" across the population.

Further, despite initial claims, it's becoming clearer and clearer that the vaccines aren't effective as wished. Not only do the vaccines not prevent people from catching COVID, they don't prevent people from dying from COVID. They also are only temporary in nature. Yes, the vaccines do provide a temporary decrease in the severity of the virus, but they also come with certain potential harmful side effects.

So when governments want to force a leaky vaccine with potentially harmful (and unknown long term) side effects onto entire populations which are overwhelmingly not at risk of dying from a disease, I consider that to be pretty authoritarian.

Yes, it's a treatment for a deadly disease. When you take it, you're 50 times less likely to end up in hospital, and the 5 million deaths worldwide could have been 100,000 deaths if we had the vaccine at the start. That's 4.9 million lives that would have been saved.

Try getting THAT deal from Hitler.

"... DID you get that deal from Hitler?

You didn't, did you?"

I don't know what that's supposed to mean, but at the end of the day, Hitler forced unwanted medical procedures onto the people. Please stop defending it when it's done today.

conservatives antivax because of politics, not "safety".

giggles, our vice president said it herself. if trump approved of the vaccine she would not take it.

well it's the biden vax now :)

fda approved :)