They’d be lighter, faster, and less likely to over penetrate.

We have real world knowledge of this being false... just ask Gaige...

Handguns are less accurate and easier to be taken away from you. However it really depends on how close the CQB is. If less then 10 feet a handgun might be better.

I concede both points. But handguns are much more maneuverable in crowded situations. It also gives you the ability to carry more ammo, to shoot two bullets at once, or to have a backup if somebody does take your gun. Depending on your risk tolerance you could also argue that a pair of revolvers might be better, but I went with more ammo. Besides, he was shooting a guy who kicked him in the face. That's pretty close.

I agree. I wonder if Kyle would have done better with a handgun or the same. Each situation is different. That's why when going to an Antifa riot it's always a good idea to have as much firepower as you can carry. 😁 That way when they start shooting at you you'll have all bases covered.

That's more like it. 😁