Blank Transparent Square

I am so sorry guys, I left my computer out during lunch and forgot to lock it and my friend apparently did this,I joined this stream to feel inspired not to have conspiracy theories posted. I didn't even realize until today. I am so deeply sorry.

Hi thatpersonrightthar, that is an interesting question. Unfortunately I am not well versed in computer programing, but if I must guess, the simulation would calculate the possible chances of our believing of that invisible God.

If so, there must be factors to that yes? Can you tell me what those factors are?

The post is quite clearly not intended to be literal- rather, he/she is metaphorically viewing the world. In terms of factors, they imply there likely isn't one- it is hypothetically pure chance, with events creating a guise of reason.

At first it wasn't so, but has become clear to me that it was anti-religious

So, because he sets his/her hypothetical algorism to where Christians believe in a God they cannot see, I've asked him/her what factors would there be in his/her model that would cause them to believe in that scenario.

There, s/he would have to look up the reasons why they would believe in His existence. S/he cannot say "They were told to" as it is, an outside influence. So, s/he must factor in "Natural Revelation" as cause for their belief in that invisible God.

This includes the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, Newtonian law of motion (cause & effect), the five classic arguments of creation, etc. Believers cannot naturally believe on their own, not w/out a cause.

At the end of this week, if s/he does not respond to me by then I will erase his/her meme.

Victor, I see what you mean-
However, existing as a simplified idea, this does not apply all of the hypotheticals. This computer simulation lacks the natural revelation. In a computer simulation, everything is a yes or a no- therefore "belief" is a binary chance. Of course, I do not legitimately believe in this.

Point well taken.