There's actually some proof dinosaurs lived during the Roman Period.

A report written by Alexander the Great about 'dragons' is not proof, as there are plenty of non-dinosaur creatures that have been mistaken for dragons in the past.

As for dragon statues looking like dinosaurs, there are plenty of explanations for that. One possibility is that dinosaur bones were discovered, marked as 'dragon bones', and boom, they know what 'dragons' look like and can build more accurate statues of them.

Yes but so many reports about "dragons" and everything in Chinese cultures and other cultures seems suspicious.

Eastern dragons are a completely different story. They're definitely not based on dinosaurs, since I don't believe there are any dinosaurs that in any way resemble Eastern dragons.

Well dragons were very different in the past. In Roman culture, they didn't have wings, or breathed fire.

Eastern dragons did not have wings, only Western dragons.
As for Romans, they believed in many similar beings besides dragons, such as wyverns, basilisks, and wyrms.

Good point. But what about the fact that they have found soft tissue containing blood cells in dinosaurs? That proves they couldn't have been millions of years old. The tissue would've decomposed by then.

Soft tissue can become fossilized or can be preserved by mineralization.

Yes, but it wasn't fossilized, and there weren't enough minerals where they found it to preserve it.

Please, enlighten me as to which specific case you are mentioning so I can further disprove your theory.

https://www.science.org/news/2017/09/i-don-t-care-what-they-say-about-me-paleontologist-stares-down-critics-her-hunt

...The fact that this woman is a New Earth Creationist, one of those religious people that believes the planet is 6000 years old, makes her entire theory invalid.

Someone's beliefs doesn't make a theory invalid.

New Earth Creationists deny things that have already been scientifically proven, such as evolution and the age of the planet. They're crazy.

There are a lot of things that evolutionists can't explain about some things.

Evoultionists can't find a way to explain how your body learned to heal itself when cut, due to the blood vessels contracting to stop bleeding.

They also said how there's a lot of leftover parts of the body from evolution that have no use, yet recently they found out that there are no leftover parts of the body.

There's also a bug that has organic cogs in the body to help synchronize the legs jumps that couldn't have came from evolution.

So you don't believe in vestigial structures, hmm? How about the human tailbone?

Are you being serious?

Yes.

Alexander The Great once wrote a report about how his men were scared to go near a cave due to "Dragons" living in it.

Also, in about 330 B.C., there is a wall statue of a soldier killing a dragon, which looks similarly to a dinosaur I forgot the name of.

My phone won't let me watch youtube.

Also, they have found dinosaur bones with soft tissue still in them.

Also, the C-14 scan they use to estimate the age is extremely unreliable and innacurate. And according to science, carbon dating won't work on anything 50,000 years or older, yet apparently dinosaurs date back to millions of years ago.

How much do you know about geology?

Why do you ask?

The next time you’re on a computer, watch this: https://youtu.be/4ONwQV26L-k

Please watch this: https://youtu.be/Do-ihwWeS3Y

Well Christopher Columbus thought a Manatee was a Mermaid, so I don't think I can believe the fact that they saw a dinosaur.

I really hope nobody tried piping one of those "mermaids"

If he did that would mean that not only did Christopher Columbus "discover America" he also discovered Rule 34

If I'm not mistaken someone named Christopher is the creator of rule 34

Now I regret being called Christopher and wish to only be referred to as Chris

I think he did

Proof?

Alexander The Great once wrote a report about how his men were scared to go near a cave due to "Dragons" living in it.

Also, in about 330 B.C., there is a wall statue of a soldier killing a dragon, which looks similarly to a dinosaur I forgot the name of.

There is no way-

Alexander The Great once wrote a report about how his men were scared to go near a cave due to "Dragons" living in it.

Also, in about 330 B.C., there is a wall statue of a soldier killing a dragon, which looks similarly to a dinosaur I forgot the name of.

What if thats just them trying to reimagine what they thought a dragon looks like though? I mean, was there someone who verified that as true?

The dragon didn't have wings, and looked sort of like a crocodile dinosaur.

So like Deinosuchus?

Yeah, I think its name starts with an X tho