@StanHalen Thanks for the information, 👍 as I had actually only barely heard of the accusations, but hadn't seen much coverage from either side of the media, which surprises me that CNN hasn't tried to hyperbolize and magnify it. So, I did look into it and from what I can see, yes, it looks like she did in fact get trademarks approved in intriguing timing that I would agree could be due to her new prominence. I had to look into what trademarks represent financially, however, to better understand. And, in comparison to Hunter Biden, having no previous business experience in the oil industry, etc., but then being given a top position with very large sums of pay for virtually no work that he put into it, these are two vastly different comparisons, but I'm in agreement that there needs to be full transparency on both. In Ivanka's case, it looks as though nothing was hidden from the public eye, and the story got attention by the media, and there's no evidence that she tried to hide it. Also, I did read that she later closed the company due to low sales, but that the trademarks could still be used until 2028, I think is what they said. So, on one hand, we have a President's daughter, using a lawyer to publicly make known her dealings so as to try to avoid any type of manipulation with government power or breaking the law (but which many said they felt wasn't enough- that's fair in my opinion), and on the other, we have a Vice President's son, having business deals even though he has no prior business ownership or business knowledge related to the dealings, AND those deals involve guaranteed millions of dollars, including to his father and uncles who were involved, per the corroborated witness of Tony Bobulinski. Whereas, Ivanka's dealings, never hidden from public view and disclosed via the legal procedures, weren't a guarantee of money from the government itself with which she filed, but did allow the possibility of her brand and name gaining wealth IF her brand sold and was profitable. I should note: she had always had similar dealings in her past before Trump even ran for Office, BUT you bring up a great point on how there needs to be transparency across the board... Once more, what I am humbly submitting to you is how the media pretends to have moral resolve and conviction when the slightest issue concerning Trump comes up, straining a gnat, as Jesus said, but they swallow a camel when their side is guilty of something larger scale & more provably corrupt.
