The only thing he does better is lying.

how come bush and trump couldn't win?

Oooooo- look at me! I got my own stalker!!!

just asking a question.
one you don't seem to want to answer.
would you prefer to disable comments?
like so many other conservative memers?

"one you don't seem to want to answer."

How's about you start over, little antagonist? Given that you have never asked me that question before, and whatnot?

Has anyone ever told you that you're cute when you're stupid?

I didn't think so . . .

But that IS a great example of how liberals create a narrative when there is none.

Step 1: DTuck calls me out as being a stalker, which I am.
Step 2: He hasn't disabled comments, so I can't accuse him of that. Of course, if he HAD disabled comments, then I still wouldn't be able to accuse him of that.
Step 3: Erect strawman = "so many" other conservatives disable comments.
Step 4: Knock strawman down = "would you prefer to disable comments . . . "
Step 5: Well, then Imma just gonna keep on stalking!! It's what I do best, and my mommy said I'm very, very special!!!
Step 6: "wHy Won'T AnY oF yOu loVE mE????!!!"

nobody is stalking you. you just have very few comments.

You're a very sad individual. You need to turn your life around, and only God can help you do that.

What happened to you that has made you the way you are? I don't really expect you to share something that personal online in a forum like this, but still, it makes me grieve a little to see what you have become.

Your life does not have to be this way.

This troll has exhibited signs of being a paid flamer for some time now. Disrupt, deflect and denounce, that's his game.

any proof god exists?

Of course there is proof that God exists . . . but are you prepared to deal with the proof honestly and fairly?

btw- given that any discussion about such proof can take time, there is still no reason why you cannot choose to change the basic direction of your life. Atheists make the claim all the time that belief in God is not necessary to have good morals.

if your proof is the bible, that was written by man, not god.

"god and religion arose to both explain away things they couldn't scientifically understand AND to create rules to live by because they could not yet muster up personal responsibility and respect for others."

You say this, yet you have no way of proving it. You want to believe it because of the reasons I have already given.

"life most likely came as spores of fungus that survived space travel on asteroids."
- Life would not survive such a travel in the harshness of space, but it begs the question- where did those spores originate from? Again, we know enough about the complexity of life to know that it could not arise without a Designer.

Everything else you said either proves a) you aren't seriously interested in real answers, or b) you are not mentally stable.

do you have evidence to the contrary?

regarding psychedelics and marrijuana, which are neither addictive nor dangerous but ARE therapeutic, you should ask conservatives to criminalize alcohol and tobacco, which are dangerous and addictive but NOT therapeutic.

"if your proof is the bible, that was written by man, not god."

That is a component of proof, most certainly. The Bible cannot be explained away by saying it was written by men, given what we know about the nature of mankind. So immediately we delve into the realm of psychology and human behavior.

But we can also look to science and all that we now know that was not known in the past, where, for instance, the flawed and essentially disproved theory of evolution was concocted to try and explain what we see. We now know enough about what we are made of to assert that there is no possible way that we got here by accident.
- There is no *missing link* to show how ANY species developed from one into a totally different one, including the alleged link between mankind and apes.
- Before you can even entertain macro-evolution, you need to explain origin of life, something that they have no clue about. There is speculation aplenty, but it is all essentially make-believe and pure imagination.
- There are way too many things we see in the universe that defy the current, yet ever changing, explanations and assumptions of the age of the universe, things which cannot exist if the universe were as old as they want it to be.
I say, "as old as they want it to be", because they need it to be that old to make sense of their naturalistic narrative.

The Bible explains human nature quite well, and this long before the "science" of psychology was refined into what it is today. Some of what it tells us is that the heart of mankind is continuously rebelling against God, and His commands.
Why is this? If we are a product of time and chance working on non-living chemicals, then why do we care about anything we do? But why not just embrace the whole concept of, (as liberals often put it) do what God says and be happy?

Better yet, why did a belief in God arise at all? It is ironic at this point that human nature is often used to try and explain away human nature. But if God did not exist, what would prompt anyone to dream that concept up? People that think such a thing is possible are doing so from already being at a point of having all sorts of information about God and religions all around them, but they fail to extrapolate backwards to a time when they would allege that no such belief existed at all. To believe that just because ancient man could not explain some natural phenomena meant that he or she would come up with the concept of God, or gods, is irrational.

god and religion arose to both explain away things they couldn't scientifically understand AND to create rules to live by because they could not yet muster up personal responsibility and respect for others.

burning bush was most likely a vision from a psychedelic plant near the actual bush moses stared at while high.

life most likely came as spores of fungus that survived space travel on asteroids.

fungus DNA is more human than plant.

magic mushrooms don't diminish the belief in god and higher concepts, they accentuate it.

"do you have evidence to the contrary?"

Evidence for what? You have already changed the subject, so there is no way to know what you are thinking.

"regarding psychedelics and marrijuana, which are neither addictive nor dangerous but ARE therapeutic, you should ask conservatives to criminalize alcohol and tobacco, which are dangerous and addictive but NOT therapeutic."

This is completely irrelevant to what we were talking about, apart from you using your imagination to explain away what constitutes a miracle. Miracles do not have natural explanations by definition.

I didn't expect you to be serious on the matter, but I have no problem asking reasonable questions. Nonsense, on the other hand, is pointless, something I was trying to help you see your way out of- being pointless.

i explained away the bible. you explained away science.

"i explained away the bible. you explained away science."

And the exact opposite is what took place. You are deluded, and according to God, you are self-deluded.
(cf. 2 Timothy 4:3-4 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Timothy+4%3A3-4&version=ESV )

As for science, unless you can get past the most fundamental facts of science, you do not have any explanation for magical meteor riding spores from space:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU7Lww-sBPg

I honestly do not know if you are aware enough for this or not, but surely by now you realize that I am considerably more intelligent than you are. That is not me bragging, just observing the obvious so I can tell you that at some point you are going to have to lay aside your rebellion and deal with life honestly. Or not- most people will end up in Hell, so why should you be any different?

big bang was most likely an advanced star/civilization that blew itself up. evidence to the contrary?