Imgflip Logo Icon

I've only witness 1 election but looking at archives, I'd say April, at a push February.

I've only witness 1 election but looking at archives, I'd say April, at a push February. | DEBATE; WHAT WAS THE MOST FRAUDULENT ELECTION ON IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS? | image tagged in debate | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
58 views 4 upvotes Made by Ms_Jackson 3 years ago in IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS
Debate memeCaption this Meme
10 Comments
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Probably don't have that debate...
Gonna be some salty comments from the usual suspects...
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
too late
1 up, 3y
Yep. Bound to happen...
[deleted] M
0 ups, 3y
April's election, 'Trump' got most of his voterbase from PoliticsTOO, even though he's supposedly a right-winger. If he was still here, he's a RUPINO.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
Definitely the election beez won. It looked like Envoy would win but most of beez's votes came from politicsTOO just like MAGA. And thanks to that dodgy result we ended up with the worst president ever. But every cloud has a silver lining I guess because thanks to that result most people (with the exception of cretins like RMK) saw through the Legion alt's fraud.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
When wubbzy ran against trump
Because it took forever for the courts to acknowledge trump won fairly (in Imgflip not irl lol) and then there was a fishy ban of trump which is still think was to get wubbzy in power. Nothing against wubbzy, but I still think the events were quite fishy.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Trump won fairly irl. Trump lost in this roleplay.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Lmao in a fair election, the electoral college would be abolished and the winner decided by the popular vote. Funny how both bush and trump lost the popular vote… got less votes. 🧐🧐
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Your definition of a "fair election" goes against the US Constitution.

The Electoral College is an essential institution that promotes:

Domestic tranquility; a national crisis would ensue if a close election required a recount, because in the absence of the Electoral College the recount would be done everywhere.

Voter fraud limitations; if either a big city or a state is used as a tool to change the outcome of elections, any damage is limited to a single state and the impact is reduced nationally.

Integration; if a few states like California or urban areas could dominate every single election, it would exclude voters in rural areas. This would have the effect of balkanising the nation geographically.

Republicanism; democratic tyranny by the majority, which the Founders strongly opposed.

The Electoral College balances power between larger and smaller states to prevent large populations within large states and cities from monopolising elections, especially taken into account the substantial disparities in population, population density, resources, and needs. Considering that a vast majority of resources supplied to big cities come from rural and suburban areas throughout the U.S., it is also important to give fair representation to smaller states beyond state-by-state power balancing interests and also take into account of economical interests to allow the U.S. to best advance itself in terms of jobs and letting the market thrive.

conservapedia.com/Electoral_College
0 ups, 3y
A tyranny of the majority is better than a tyranny of the minority. It should represent the population equally. A republicans vote in California is not going to do anything to change the election as much as one in a swing state like Florida or a safe state like Texas.
What happens then is you get politicians pandering to a select few states that switch each election and you get winners of election who didn’t get more votes. This happened 5 times!
And don’t give me that bull about rural voters not being represented. Their vote would be equal.
And yes, I think a tyranny of the majority is far better than one of the minority.
Debate memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
DEBATE; WHAT WAS THE MOST FRAUDULENT ELECTION ON IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS?