Gavin Newsom lost

Because, and pay attention here because THIS IS VERY COMMON

It is easy to count votes in places where not many people live, and it takes a long time to count votes in places where a lot of people live.

And we already know that Republicans do very well in places where not many people live, and Democrats do very well in places where a lot of people live.

So once you've counted the votes in the suburbs where the real swing votes are, you can pretty confidently (95% accurately) predict how the rest of the votes are going to go.

Which leads to what you're seeing which is called a Red Mirage AND IT HAPPENS IN EVERY ELECTION SO GET USED TO IT: Republicans look like they're winning because their votes in the countryside are counted very quickly but the city votes where the numbers more than make up for it can take all night.

Make sure you check out Mike Lindell's cyber security symposium on the 10th, 11th and 12th so you can see just how wrong you really are about this election. It will be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that not only did Trump win by upwards of 14 million votes, but that China was the biggest culprit behind the fraud. You can watch it at https://home.frankspeech.com/ starting tomorrow.

Mike Lindell is full of shit.

Watch tomorrow and you'll see for yourself.

He can throw out all the made-up numbers his dumb ass can dream up, but he'll have to provide proof. Nobody's done that so far.

I absolutely will NOT check that out. If you have actual proof this time, go straight to the court room with it. 70 court judges found that your "evidence" was nothing but garbage. THEY'RE the ones you should be trying to convince, not me.

Stop watching Rachel Madow. She doesn't know her ass from a whole in the ground. Watch tomorrow and you'll see for yourself.

I won't. And I am not a federal court judge so why do you care?

Ignorance is bliss. You talk shit but when someone puts it in your face, you run away like every brainwashed liberal sheep.

Did I mention I am not a federal court judge?

You're not building a legal case, you're building a PR stunt!

Doesn't matter as long as the evidence is real. I talked to my cyber security buddy after Mike leaked some of what he has earlier today and he said "It's a slam dunk."

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Ok, so your buddy was an expert witness in the federal lawsuits?

He is someone who can look at what Mike presented and say "Yes, there is no way in hell he could have that unless the machines were connected to the internet and therefore vulnerable to hacks. And on top of that data, they also have all the corresponding data that shows who hacked each packet. And the overwhelming majority of those hacks came from China. Does that make sense?

No. It doesn't. How is it that Pillow Guy has proof that nobody else ever had?

It's really easy to check electronic records against hard copies of these ballots and they did so, twice in some states. So you'd STILL have no evidence.

You have to show the experts first so they can verify it in front of the whole world. Then you present it to the courts with all of their testimony and all of that evidence. That's what he's doing. You'll see tomorrow.

At no point in the legal process does a televised presentation have to take place before you can present an expert witness. Who the hell told you that?

You have to show the experts what you have to solidify it. He has over 90 cyber security experts coming tomorrow to try and debunk what he has for a five million dollar reward. If he actually has the packets he says he has, that means he was able to hack the voting machines and steal or alter the data. THEN they'll take it to the supreme court which is exactly what he's going to do.

And the supreme court will say "says here that the voting records were checked manually against physical ballots and also didn't a lower court already throw this case out?"

You don't understand the evidence. If he has what he says he has, that means that not only were the machines connected to the internet, but the data was easily able to be hacked and altered before the packets were sent to their destination. They're not going to look at bogus voting records inserted by corrupt politicians in light of REAL evidence.

I am not a court judge! My understanding or lack of understanding of the evidence is irrelevant - my opinion doesn't matter. The judges are the people you need to convince. And they wrote that your evidence was garbage.

Nonsense. They have not seen it yet. No one has yet outside of his inner circle. But the world is going to see it tomorrow. You should be happy about it. I mean if you're so certain you're correct and that this is BS, you should be stocked to see the charade play out.

The charade played it ten months ago. It's been over for almost a year. I'm not watching your waste of time. And I'm not a federal court judge so who cares what I do?

Lower courts threw out everything because of technicalities and clever little loopholes. They never even looked at anything. But you don't know this because you get all your information from fake news who wants this to go away in a big way. The truth is the courts always cater to the left because they use Antifa and BLM, ect to intimidate justices. So you have to do something so huge that everybody see it and then all of the people sitting on the fence will jump behind you and demand the courts do their job.

No, read the rulings - they threw it out because you didn't have evidence!

You still don't!

They never looked at the evidence. PERIOD. And YES, they do have the evidence! Watch tomorrow. Why are you scared?

Scared that I'll be appointed a federal court judge and be forced to decide? Not really.