#orangemanback

This aughta be good. I shall reserve my laughter till after nothing happens

70 court judges very publicly wrote in their ruling that you do NOT have evidence

...and wrote their ticket to the John Roberts wing of Gitmo in the process. If they live that long.

It would have to be. Gitmo being, infamously, the place where you send people when you don't have a case to prosecute them with.

In this case it'll probably entail the forensic server evidence they were trying to destroy in TN.

Time may yet tell.

Time ALREADY told. Time told about ten months ago. It's been over for almost a year now. There's nothing left for time to tell. Your theories about this have all been garbage from start to finish and once again, we're at the point where I remind you that you believe stuff you read on there internet too easily.

Yeah. And the sound barrier could never be broken.

Until it was.

The difference between us is, you think we exist at the apex of truth.

I believe time and truth are evolutionary processes.

That makes my mindset scientific, and yours dogma.

Um.... but that doesn't change the fact that the 2020 election was settled decisively ten months ago.

What a fatuous and unintelligent answer.

So was the luminiferous ether. A century ago.

Until it wasn't.

You're just not equal to grasping concepts like this. As in not actually mentally capable of processing the concept of your own fallacious assumptions pretty much at all. Thread over.

The principle difference being that we could see the 2020 election votes.

And count them.

Twice.

Three times in some places.

Typical of you not to admit your fallacy.

All the evidence was "adduced" for geocentrism too.

Till it was proven to be bullshit.

(And by the way, it's "principal," not "principle.")

Really. Time spent explaining the most elementary concepts to you is wasted.

@antithesis reply (since end of string):

You can't possibly, possibly be so dense as to not grasp that people like me aren't already acquainted with the existing MSM account.

Having spent time in corrupt third world countries that you have not, there are not fewer than a dozen ways to circumvent stuff like that.

You get to the stuff in the overnight, you dump in things like "veterans'" batches all curiously 100% for Biden instead of vice versa. You recount already subverted batches, etc. Where the issue was not the counting. Or others like that MI case I memed where they're recounting, and the checkers are reporting multiple identical signatures - and the recount forewoman actually tells them their job is not to question the obvious fraud, but simply to tally the results.

It actually is that brazen.

And then there's the electronic stuff, which I've already detailed.

You're either grasping the concept of wilful coverup like that or you're not.

For now, I draw my own conclusion, you draw yours.

The elementary concept, once again, being that the votes were physically there in front of us in a size and shape that we could just count.

Twice.

Three times in some places.