mfs be like "tiktok is toxic" then act just as toxic when someone disagrees

Ironic how you call me toxic even though your insulting me only for criticizing your meme. nd writing long paragraphs won't prove your right.

And how about this, let's criticize your memes... well straight off the bat you're leeching off tiktok memes, how original. What else... oh, you don't even have a clue what you're talking about either, with EXTREME misinformation about furries. You act exactly just like toxic tiktokers do, mate. Like, holy f**k, anthropomorphic animals can consent you brain-dead monkey? There's a huge difference between anthropomorphic, consenting and intelligent beings and basic animals which can't consent. Also, you're comparing them to pedophilia, big red flag right there, mate. And you also think hunting otherkins (mind you, they aren't doing anything wrong towards you or anyone, do your f**king research) is okay, I guess murdering you and your entire family is okay as well.

-I make those TikTok memes to point out that TikTok sucks. And am not lying about furries, I was talking about the perverted side of the fandom. -It does not matter if it can consent or not, if its a non human animal its still bestiality: They cannot be attracted, they where not designed to mate, this can result in the spread of zoonotic diseases and fatal injuries since their organs aren't compatible, and this has multiple disgusting implications. -And i was joking about otherkins, i never said that it was ok the ACTUALLY hunt them, i only said that to mock them. This ideology is dangerous and people who identify as such need to seek help ASAP.

It genuinely amazes me how much you won't listen. You're an idiot who's accused me of allowing pedophilia, does not understand the difference between an anthro and an animal, called me a f**king extremist liberal? Politics has nothing to do with this you f**king idiot.

ANIMALS ARE NOT F**KING FURRIES. There is a blatant f**king difference there that you are not seeing. Zoonotic diseases and problems arise from ANIMALS. THE WHOLE POINT OF AN ANTHROPOMORPHIC CREATURE IS THAT IT HAS SHARES HUMAN PROPERTIES. You f**king listening? ANTHRO =/= ANIMAL. That means an anthropomorphic creature CAN CONSENT, DOES NOT HAVE DISEASES, AND IS NOTHING LIKE F**KING AN ANIMAL. GET. IT. IN. YOUR. HEAD.

But you won't listen. Watch, you're about to try and make some stupid f**king argument that just ignores everything I said above.

"You're a hypocritical idiot" how exactly? Anthropomorphic animals are still animals. " For f**king starters, they are fictional" Lolis are fictional, so simpin on Lolis would not be pedo**lia according to your logic. The fact that an animal is anthropomorphic does not mean it has to be sexualised, so why are you sexualizing it? "You'd be fine with a humanoid demon so why not a humanoid wolf or something?" Because the is a difference between a human with red skin and a talking wolf that walks on two legs. "There is a serious difference between anthropomorphism, and animals" I think you don't know what an animal is, and thats possibly because you know nothing of biology, which would explain why you think a human can be attracted to a talking wolf. Let me put in a way that your extremist liberal brain can understand. An animal is any organism part of the Kingdom Animalia. Humans are part of Animalia too, so a non human animal is any animal excluding humanity, just as how non avian dinosaur is any dinosaur excluding birds as birds are dinosaurs too. Furries are animals and they will always be animals. And no furries are not a species of humans, furries are dogs that walk on two legs. "How does it not f**king matter if it can consent or not??? The whole point of why beastiality is wrong is because it's abusive and they can't consent, listen to yourself." Many biologists and doctors disagree with you on that. Intercourse with animals can result in injuries and spread of zoonotic diseases, and as i told you they cannot be attracted and this has many disgusting implications. Read this article and you'll understand: https://unlockingwords.wordpress.com/2019/07/17/bestiality-the-consequences/

I'm genuinely done with people like you because you never learn, and you never listen. Wouldn't be surprised if you're sexist, homophobic, maybe even transphobic, because you are sure f**king good at not understanding groups that aren't related to you.

Am none of those things. Just because i disagree with you does not make me a homophobe, stop being such an extremist liberal snowflake SJW. And its ironic how you say " because you are sure f**king good at not understanding groups that aren't related to you." Just as how you don't understand TikTok haters and Furry Slayers. If you don't understand Furry Slayers or TikTok haters then what gives you the right to shit talk about them, huh?

You've lost the argument. You've just copied and pasted the same f**king argument, and you still ignore what I say. Why are you ignoring what I say? It's because you don't have a better f**king argument, so you just try to look past everything I say, or take everything I say wrong, while you call me political bullshit and whatnot to make yourself feel right.

You're a f**king idiot, just going to say it now. You're a hypocritical idiot who criticizes my memes but you use the same idea repeatedly. Also, you ARE lying about the fandom. You describe it as if the entire group is perverted, or even a majority, it f**king isn't and you clearly don't know enough of the fandom to EVEN BE TALKING ABOUT IT.

Plus, are you f**king serious about anthropomorphic animals? For f**king starters, they are fictional, how the f**k are you gonna spread zoonotic diseases and fatal injuries with FICTIONAL, HUMANOID CREATURES. You'd be fine with a humanoid demon so why not a humanoid wolf or something? There is a serious difference between anthropomorphism, and animals, but you won't acknowledge that. You're gonna continue to not acknowledge that, because you think you're always right about things you aren't even properly educated about.

I don't think you f**king realise the difference between anthro, and animal. One is humanoid, can consent, and is basically just another "species" of human, and an animal is, well, a f**king animal which can't consent and is literally illegal to have intercourse with.

How does it not f**king matter if it can consent or not??? The whole point of why beastiality is wrong is because it's abusive and they can't consent, listen to yourself.

"You're a hypocritical idiot" how exactly? Anthropomorphic animals are still animals. " For f**king starters, they are fictional" Lolis are fictional, so simpin on Lolis would not be pedo**lia according to your logic. The fact that an animal is anthropomorphic does not mean it has to be sexualised, so why are you sexualizing it? "You'd be fine with a humanoid demon so why not a humanoid wolf or something?" Because the is a difference between a human with red skin and a talking wolf that walks on two legs. "There is a serious difference between anthropomorphism, and animals" I think you don't know what an animal is, and thats possibly because you know nothing of biology, which would explain why you think a human can be attracted to a talking wolf. Let me put in a way that your extremist liberal brain can understand. An animal is any organism part of the Kingdom Animalia. Humans are part of Animalia too, so a non human animal is any animal excluding humanity, just as how non avian dinosaur is any dinosaur excluding birds as birds are dinosaurs too. Furries are animals and they will always be animals. And no furries are not a species of humans, furries are dogs that walk on two legs. "How does it not f**king matter if it can consent or not??? The whole point of why beastiality is wrong is because it's abusive and they can't consent, listen to yourself." Many biologists and doctors disagree with you on that. Intercourse with animals can result in injuries and spread of zoonotic diseases, and as i told you they cannot be attracted and this has many disgusting implications. Read this article and you'll understand: https://unlockingwords.wordpress.com/2019/07/17/bestiality-the-consequences/

AAAAAAAND THERE IT IS. You've ignored everything I just said. Congratulations, you're being blissfully ignorant to avoid the truth.

Yelling proves your immature.

I'm not gonna argue with my friend because their just gonna offer the exact same points as you. I know full well what an animal is. However, there's a blatant f**king difference between anthropomorphised furries and feral animals that you keep on

You can continue going off about this, I'm done arguing with you because you've taken all my points and pushed them aside, "furry hunter" edgelord.

He is my friend not yours. Also, our debating methods are very different, so it wont be the same thing as this one. Pls at least give it a try: https://paradise-a-gamers-and-furry-community.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Urocian

Also am not an edgelord.

He is my friend not yours. Also, our debating methods are very different, so it wont be the same thing as this one. Pls at least give it a try: https://paradise-a-gamers-and-furry-community.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Urocian

Also am not an edgelord.

If "debunked" means "denied", then sure. Because I know more about the community, and probably more about BIOLOGY, than you. The whole reason zoophilia is illegal is because animals can't consent, and even if they could, diseases are a significant issue.

If you weren't such a dumbass, you'd realise furries can consent, and they don't have diseases. That would just be stupid, they aren't just "animals on two legs". Anthropomorphism is defined as giving human characteristics to an animal. "Human" characteristics not just being "walking on two legs", but much more.

Stop trying to tell me, a person who is literally a f**king furry and is in the fandom, about furries. You clearly know nothing, yet you think you know everything about us. AND YOU WILL CONTINUE EVEN AFTER READING THIS.

"a person who is literally a f**king furry" Ohhhhh know i get why your so hardcore with this thing about furries. Your just yet another furry who is uncappable of taking criticism and relies on demonizing its critics for the sake of wanting to force the world to like you. "The whole reason zoophilia is illegal is because animals can't consent" Then why did you mention the diseases part? And you also forgot about the fatal injuries and the other disgusting implications this has. And bestiality is wrong for more than one reason, the fact that they are not recognized does not mean their not there. And even if the law doesn't recognize them, biologists,scientists, doctors and crusaders do. Also, how do you know if furries can consent? Cartoons have shown feral animals with Sapience, like Scooby Doo. So that means there can also be non sapient furries too. And as i told you, furries are still animals. And the fact that something is anthropomorphic does not mean you have to sexualise it. So why are you doing it? Your are one of the many reasons i dislike furries.

Well, congratulations, now you've brought up literal f**king animals. Albeit, they can consent, it's just pretty f**king weird.

Fact is, you don't understand what consent is. The only real reason you think sexualising furries is bad is because they are animals, which completely undermines the point that they are not just "animals", and you think because someone sexualises furries means that they would sexualise literal animals as well. That's entirely false as well. Just stop talking to me if you aren't gonna listen, honestly.

I already told you what an animal is. And yes i know what consent is, but it appears you don't know what an animal is. Why don't you try arguing with my friend Urocian and see what he has to say?: https://paradise-a-gamers-and-furry-community.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Urocian

Lmao just stfu. Just shut. The f**k. Up. First of all, I did listen to your points, and immediately proved them wrong easily. The website you linked was relating to f**king animals, it's plain common sense. The fact you think a demon is okay but a furry isn't just goes to show your lack of critical thinking skills and absolute f**king refusal to accept that you're wrong.

I mean, if a demon is okay because it's just a change in skin colour, then a furry is okay because it's just a change in skin, altered hands and feet, and a different head. It's literally absolutely fine.

You are literally talking for a group you aren't even part of. You probably think being a furry is a fetish, which it isn't. And by the way, https://www.deviantart.com/kooborisapphire/art/Anthro-is-not-bestiality-172494150, why don't you go f**king read that and learn what consent means. You aren't using your brain. You aren't realising that furries are not feral animals. I mean the major difference is that they have a brain capable of human intelligence. Other ones include human body-form, human features in general, and more, but you won't acknowledge that, even though it's just like a hairy human with their body slightly mutated.

Furries are animals that walk on two legs. Also, demons are humans with red skin, furries are wolves that walk on two legs. Big difference. And i have all the right to talk about furries as this fandom has been proven to have lots of problems. And its ironic how you tell me to not talk about furries even though you like talking about TikTok haters despite not being one. I know what consent is, but having sex with non human animals is inherently bad regardless of consent. And no its not a hairy human, its a dog that walks on two legs. And that link you send me is from a degenerate Deviantart user who likes spreading propaganda and is an extremist liberal. Deviantart users are cringe and that essay is awful. Stop being such a toxic liberal SJW.

You refuse to accept your wrong, that's it. Nothing's going to get to you, because you act like you understand an entire community you aren't even in. You see a minority in the community and decide that makes up the ENTIRE COMMUNITY. That's like saying because 12 school kids are doing drugs, everyone in school does drugs. It makes no sense.

Anywho, stay mad, all your arguments boil down to denial or just plain insulting, e.g. political insult, deciding because someone is from DeviantArt their opinion is invalid, etcetera.

This fandom is not even a community as multiple subgroups who have different idologies and constantly disagree with one another. And as i told ya, your a mayor hypocrite for saying i cannot criticize a community am not part of yet you criticize Nazis despite not being one. And you alo contradicted yourself once more. First you say that not all of them make rule34 of animal characters but then proceed to defend it. And its ironic how you accuse me of denial and insulting considering that exactly what you do, ya spoiled brat.

-I make those TikTok memes to point out that TikTok sucks. And am not lying about furries, I was talking about the perverted side of the fandom. -It does not matter if it can consent or not, if its a non human animal its still bestiality: They cannot be attracted, they where not designed to mate, this can result in the spread of zoonotic diseases and fatal injuries since their organs aren't compatible, and this has multiple disgusting implications. -And i was joking about otherkins, i never said that it was ok the ACTUALLY hunt them, i only said that to mock them. This ideology is dangerous and people who identify as such need to seek help ASAP.

Again, I'm not a f**king liberal lmao. I don't give a f**k about politics, nor could I really care about you. At this point it's just fun watching you come up with random unrelated insults. I mean, you're telling me, a person who's literally IN THE COMMUNITY, about the community.

Ironic how you call me immature even though you keep using LMAO in almost all your sentences. And ironic how you claim that what am saying are not facts even though your only evidence to prove that antrho SUPPOSEDELY is not beastiality was from a degenerate user from Deviantart.

You are seriously still ignoring everything I said. You've already lost the argument - blissful ignorance towards the opposition to get your own way in life.

Being edgy won't prove your right.

I'm done arguing.

And we don't you argue with my friend Urocian: https://paradise-a-gamers-and-furry-community.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Urocian

Holy f**k, nevermind, you're just stupid. First of all you're calling me a democrat, progressive SJW, the f**k is that supposed to mean? This isn't about politics you dense rock.

Anywho, so you're telling me, that because a furry is fictional, their intellect can be modified by the owner. So, EVEN IF their intellect IS as high as a human, it's still beastiality?

Now let's take your logic here. A demon person is NOT a human. They are also fictional. Therefore, it's wrong. But you say it's right. So where's your f**king logic? NOWHERE. You've already failed to make a point.

And hey, I mean, humans are animals too. Just wanted to point that out. :)

"Your just stupid" So the dude who thinks that a human can be attracted to a talking cow. And am calling you a toxic left wing because the extreme liberalistic behaviors your showing are common in toxic SJWs. And as i told you, those demon persons are called SUCCUBIS. Succbuis are humans with red skin. And yes i know humans are animals, but where not the same kind of animal as wolfs.

"Your just stupid" So the dude who thinks that a human can be attracted to a talking cow. And am calling you a toxic left wing because the extreme liberalistic behaviors your showing are common in toxic SJWs. And as i told you, those demon persons are called SUCCUBIS. Succubus are humans with red skin. And yes i know humans are animals, but where not the same kind of animal as wolfs. Also, why don't you ask my friend Urocian about this, he is a furry like you: https://paradise-a-gamers-and-furry-community.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Urocian

I'm not trying to be cool, I'm actually just angry that you won't take any of my points seriously. They aren't awful. You just don't understand what "anthropomorphic" really means in a furry sense. There's no zoonotic diseases or whatever bullshit you're coming up with, because they are referring to animals.

Plus, you tell me I know nothing about biology, but you think anything that isn't a human is an animal? Well, that means a demon person, as stated before, is an animal in your logic. That means they must have zoonotic diseases and can't consent. You see how dumb your point is?

An anthropomorphic entity is something that has animal-like traits (fur, ears, face, etcetera), but has human-like traits as well (human body form, and a HUMAN BRAIN, and NO ZOONOTIC DISEASES YOU DENSE ROCK.)

I copy and pasted because YOU are the one who did not listen to my points and did not read the page i gave you. I explained to you that furries are still animals and yet you fail to listen. Also i never accused you of pedophilia. And the reason why i call you liberal crybaby is because you falsely accuse me of being a homophobe, say that anyone with an opposing view is toxic, you want to legalize sexualization of furries which is bestiality. Also, demon people are not animals as their reskinned humans with red skin. Its not the same as a a talking wolf that walks on two legs. And as i told you, the fact that their anthro does not change the fact that their still animals and that your not suppose to sexualize them. In fact, someone made a Reddit meme in which they mocked ya: https://www.reddit.com/r/virginvschad/comments/mufdtq/the_virgin_furry_vs_the_chad_skinwalker/

Oh, first of all that's not even what edgy f**king means. Secondly, you're the edgy one because you consider yourself a "furry slayer". AND YOU'RE STILL IGNORING MY POINTS.

I listened to your points, thing is that your points are awful. And yes i know what edgy is. And your the edgy one here because aside from yelling your also using curse words thinking it will make you look cool.

Lmao, ok, I do not give a f**k about politics. Secondly, "attracted to a talking cow" is a strawman argument and completely removes the part where it says they are anthropomorphic, show human qualities and characteristics, which includes consent.

Also, you can't just say "well I have a furry friend who thinks otherwise!", because that's like a racist person saying "well I have a black friend so I'm not racist."

Furries are not a race. And a i mean talking cow in the sense of a sapient feral cow. Ever heard of talking animals in fiction? And as i said, the fact that their anthro does not mean they have to be sexualised, their animals. And i gave you the link so you went to talk to Urocian so he could prove you wrong.

CAN YOU SHUT THE F**K UP AND LISTEN FOR FIVE SECONDS! Now you're using f**king stawman arguments against me?!

Why did I mention the diseases part? BECAUSE YOU DID!

Is beastiality and zoophilia bad? YES, BUT FURRIES AREN'T BEASTIALITY!

How do I know if furries can consent? BECAUSE THEY F**KING SAID IT THEMSELVES?! WHAT KIND OF QUESTION IS THAT?! That's like asking "Well how do you know if humans can consent?" BECAUSE THEY SPECIFICALLY SAID IT THEMSELVES??? AND THEY HAVE THE BRAIN CAPABILITIES TO UNDERSTAND IT.

There is an incredible different between sexualising furries and sexualising animals, but you'll never f**king listen. Ever. You've literally resorted to blaming me for beastiality. Yeah, mate, there's a F**KING DIFFERENCE between an ANIMAL and a FURRY, SOMETHING THAT CAN F**KING CONSENT, ISN'T DANGEROUS, AND LITERALLY HAS A F**KING HUMAN BODY FORM.

First off, stop being such a hardcore democrat progressive SJW and stop yelling. Second, you clearly don't know what an animal even is. An animal is any organism part of the kingdom Animalia. Humans are also from Animalia. So a non human animal is any animal that is not from Homo, including furries, as their bipedal dogs. And its obvious humans can consent as have seen humans before. But furries are fictional, so their intellect can be modified by the author. So yeah furries are bestiality. And its obvious you don't know anything of biology as you think a human can be sexually attracted to a talking rat. Also the fact that something is antrho does not mean you have to sexualise it, so why are you doing it?

Please, tell me more about a fandom you aren't in, try and call me a hypocrite using NAZIS and calling me a spoiled brat, even though clearly you're so determined to prove yourself right you are using every single thing you can. That's embarassing.

"you're so determined to prove yourself right you are using every single thing you can" Thats exactly what your doing, which is why you used a degenerate deviants rant from Deviantart to prove your awful ideology despite how flawed it is. Go touch grass liberal.

Lmao what? Ok, so "laughing my ass off" is immature now, even though plenty of people use it in general? Also, I gave much more proof beyond a "degenerate" user from DeviantArt, but you're just ignoring that.

I know lots of people use it, but you keep using it over and over and for no reason at all. And i read your proof, but also debunked it.