SurlyKong (and perhaps 123gamer) have supported enemies like Richard, Envoy and Finlayson every step of the way.

As I_P Moderator, you enforced a new law on other users content, reversed the enforcement on your own content. Apparently you view yourself as being above I_P law(s). You were caught red-handed fixing the I_P system, solely for your benefit.

He wasn’t the only one who supported this, Congress agreed to pass the law through and you stripped IG of his mod for that.

IG has been saying since yesterday it's a non-existent law. Which was it yesterday, law or non-existent law?

I removed IG as Moderator because I caught him breaking that I_P law.

What I_P law? The fact he tried banning NSFW LGBTQ+ content? I’m for that and the fact you banned him for something Congress approved? I just don’t get it.

And I_P owner, you targeted a single user with a non-existent law, refused to apologise for this mistake and even blamed it on me, and then removed my status as mod when I changed one NSFW tag on a law that no longer exists anyway because it's clear you were opposed to the new law from the beginning and just started deleting all my comments knowing it would tick me off so you could reverse the law. I know your game, and everyone is asking for me to be reinstated as mod to end this drama YOU started and refuse to apologise for. You've caused more chaos in a few days than Envoy (who we thought was our worst ever mod until you came along) in his months as owner.

Why do you keep saying "non existent law"? You proposed it, you announced it.

5hxw0v.jpg (click to show)

I had nothing to do with passing the law and did nothing to oppose it. I only acted on the poorly worded law after you announced it passed and became one of the Stream Rules.

Quite to the contrary, not "everyone" is asking for you to be reinstated. Some are suggesting you be banned from I_P.

name them

Probably Ricardo Chill.

And himself

That's only 2

Yeah, I’d rather believe a mushroom than Richard and Andy isn’t explaining what rule IG broke.

Yup knew you where gonna say some thing about me supporting Richard I did not support Richard with the British stuff i was on his side with the meme chats and envoy the only thing I was with was the meme chats being fake and did not really say I was with Andrew I just said I don't like the evidence your using

"I didn't support Richard, I was just on his side"

"I didn't agree with Envoy I was just with him"

"I wasn't with Andrew I just helped shield him from consequences"

Yeah thanks for basically proving my point lol

So If I defend Richard because I think the meme chats are fake means I supported him with every thing he has done also the same thing with envoy also I guess if I say my opinion about your evidence means that I am helping Andrew first of all I haven't even talked to him (I think but I know I haven't talked to him about this drama)

Don't get me wrong, I have all respect for Surly as a memer but as a political figure, he's just wrong.

And I respected Envoy as a presidential candidate, but as a stream owner he doesn't do his job too well. But some users I'm not afraid to say I don't respect are RichardChill24, Omega_Void, RMK, AndrewFinlayson and AmericanProduct.

And Beez (he’s on your hostage list)

...and beez yeah.

Check the IP stream he said who he was

Just because you never read the law doesn't mean it doesn't apply to you.
What part of Congress shall make no law infringing on political speech don't you understand?

I've read the law and it applies to me.

And I don't understand why you're more concerned about an elected Congress temporarily banning a user who threatened others with terrorism than a small group of all-powerful unelected stream owners abusing their powers to obstruct the democratic process of this stream and it's elected officials.

You ran as a "freedom of expression" candidate.
Everything you've done has been an effort to silence anyone who disagrees with you.
Why would I be concerned by that?
Why?
I can't figure it out!
Oh wait.
Because I'm an actual free speech conservative, not just a dictator that wants to censor all who cross him.

And if you want to vote I want you to answer us one question: will you vote PR1CE and I for President, and whoever wins the HOC nomination (most likely Pollard) for HOC?

Sure. As long as I'm a RUP party member I'll vote RUP. I'm a party member til I so, not you. Cause of freedom.
See how that works?
Sorry, I know that hurts your feelings.

It doesn't "hurt my feelings" but ok whatever you want to tell yourself.

You may vote in the primaries now that I have PR1CE's confirmation.

If you want your vote to be counted you’ll have to vote on strawpoll again.

Maybe if I vote often enough you'll actually count it? Golly gee! Democrat much? Can't you just vote 10 times for me?

lol you voted once and got it removed after even F1Fan initially agreed with my decision until I decided to let you vote a second time and you start overreacting like the drama queen you are.

And I still am.
That's a complete lie. I held the vote on Dr.Strangmeme's free speech amendment, which I supported and I believe you voted against funnily enough.

I'm not the one supporting the dictatorial anti-free speech stream owners.

You tried to silence the LGBTQ community cause you don't like em...
What the heck dew you call that, My Leige

You're more concerned about me defending IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS from hostile streams by posting memes on a completely different stream than the autocratic stream owners you're so friendly with abusing their power to obstruct our democracy?

The delta force is the official Imgflip presidents military. You made this meme. You attempted (unsuccessfully) to chill the speech of your political opponents with your lil anti LGBTQ speech bill.
This is not a debate. I'm not accusing you of this. You did this. I'm pro freedom of speech. What are you?

It’s not a debate? You get to just determine things now? With what authority? And you simultaneously claim to be pro-free speech? I’m the free speech one here. You’re the contrarian who worships the power abuse of the unelected autocratic dictators of IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS and rages when democratic Congress votes and primaries don’t go your way.

The thing about fact...
Yeah.
They don't care about your feelings...

Then stop being wrong all the time lol

●Fact: you threateneded the LGBTQ community
●Fact: you tried to silence them with your failed censorship bill
●Fact: you're trying to change the subject because you have no defense of your unconstitutional behavior
●Fact: YOU DID THIS. This is not debatable, this is not an accusation. I took this photo yesterday. You attacked your political opponents and then tried unsuccessfully to silence them.
●Fact: you tried to silence my political speech today by cheating in your own primary. (You do realise that deciding who gets to vote based on who they voted for is illegal right? Doofenshmirtz gets to vote even tho he quit the party cause he voted for your friend?I don't get to vote cause I voted for my friend?)
●Fact: in the USA freedom of speech is freedom of EVERYONE'S speech, not just the king's speech.

lol none of those were facts when just because you put the word “fact” there doesn’t make them true. That’s not how facts work I’m afraid.

●False, I never threatened them. I only wanted to denounce them.
●False, I never tried to censor them or pass a bill like that. Again, I only wanted to denounce the actions of the stream.
●False, I’m only addressing your points.
●False, and you saying it’s true doesn’t change anything.
●False, I’m letting you vote now and I only questioned your eligibility because your history of l criticising literally everything the party does makes me question your loyalty to it, but nonetheless I’m letting you vote anyway because I’m willing to compromise unlike you.
●Ok that’s the only true statement you’ve made, but a broken clock is right twice a day.