Arthur's announcement template

For me it depends on the situation. If it's superstraight as in straight with genital preferences, that's cool, I get it, but other times it can be people who are like 'trans women aren't real women' and 'trans men aren't real men', which is toxic.

Same

anything is transphobic at this rate

Finally

Ah?

I've practically been called transphobe for calling them valid, Thank God i'm not the only one xD

We are transphobic transfolk, Reaper.

Probably xD

…But transfolk can be gay, lesbian and bi. Even superstraight™. I think I may be missing the point tho (hehe)

I understand that. But the fact that its called "super" straight makes it sound like if a person is cis and you date them, you are straighter than you would've been if you had dated a trans person.

That's gay

You're super gay

Yes
Stop f**king letting me know that

h

H is racist!!!!!!!

But super straight isn't a sexuality. It's a genital preference so calling the super straights a sexuality different than straight is mocking valid sexualities. Super straight is literally just a breeding kink

No its not x3

Why is it okay for any other Sexuality to prefer a gender, but it isn't okay for someone to prefer cis/trans?

Heres the thing, I'm going put the fact that the superstraight thing started all as a joke, because the guy who invented meant it as a joke but I'm going to put that aside. Theres a difference for preference and attraction. I like male and female, but I prefer female. So I dont count as a lesbian. Really the sexuality isnt transphobic itself because it's all a preference but then again, why are we parting the same gender apart? I dont get what difference a trans person and a cis person. are in gender term, it's the same gender. That's why it's a preference because either they dont want a sexual relationship with a trans person because of private preference or they dont think a trans person counts as that gender. How would a superstraight react to someone who both medically and socially transitioned. If someone doesnt want to date a trans person that's fine but I think its unnecessary to make a sexuality out of it. Yeesh that was long. I'd be surprised if you actually read this to the end.

SOMEONE WHO MAKES SENSE THANK YOU

ok, something needs to be said here. There is a difference between preferences and excluding. If you prefer a certain race/ you find a certain race more attractive, that is a preference. If you say you would never date a person of certain race because they are that race, that is exclusion and racist. The same goes here. If you have a preference to not date a trans person, that is 100% ok!! But “super straight” is excluding trans people, and therefore is transphobic.

There is nothing wrong with not being attracted to transfolk-

I'M Trans and because of that certain people will not date me. It's their right to choose who they love and you CANNOT hate them for it because by that logic gay men are sexist. Black men who only like white women are somehow racist. And ace people are just evil.

No-

Because tgen being Ace is discrimination lol.

Then*