Distinction is important.

Farmers eat fertilized eggs too lol.

On more than just chickens and fish

The difference is simple: Fish are fish, and are here to be eaten.
People, not so much.
Unless, Planned Parenthood suddenly starts marketing aborted fetuses as "caviar"

cue the hate in 5, 4, 3, 2, ...

There is no difference as I'm not speaking about eating them. I'm talking about classification of life forms in their developmental stages, and the implications therein. As such, when you ask for apples, you don't ask for a tree. If you want caviar, you don't ask for fish. An embryo is not a human.it is an embryo. A zygote is not a human, it is a zygote.

Excellent red herring though.

Cue more semantics based on sentimentality in 3... 2...

Technically it's fish. Yes I am pro-life

With regard to semantics, yes. But it's caviar.

They are fish in a different stage of development.

Not that there's a moral issue eating fish or caviar, mind you.

The restaurant needs to work on its service though...

you're here saying that its fine to kill fish in another form of development but not humans... what happened to your whole sacred life speech?

Do you think a fish is honestly on the same level of moral weight as a human?

Nuance, my friend, nuance. We shouldn't torment animals or kill them for sport, but there is nothing wrong with eating animals either...we are omnivores, after all. There's a reason why cannibalism is considered a huge crime and hunting deer is not.

Yes, spoken wonderfully

still, a life is a life, and long ago, we could have been evolving from fish ourselves. i completely think that some animals life has just as much value as ours. im not some vegan, i eat meat, but saying that a life taken from an animal other than us is meaningless just because they are different is just wrong.

Read igk3777's comment

which one

The one 5 comments above this one. You really can't miss it.

yea i read it

thats what i meant to reply to