PANDEMIC POLITICAL PERIL

They don't WANT to understand because doing so would derail their political narrative; i.e., their endless distribution of party approved political propaganda talking points.

Can't take a joke, eh? How unfortunate for you...

Sorry, DH, but you aren't the boss of what's a joke and what isn't. How very unfortunate for you. I do find it interesting that you went right to personal attacks with both of your comments, though; it tends to indicate a deep-seated bitterness or ego-rooted insecurity.

Interesting. So what would you consider to be "supporting criminals over regular citizens"?

According to Snopes, the Harris allegation is almost a complete fabrication. If you have proof to the contrary coming from a source owing no allegiance to a political group and having no vested interest in pushing a political agenda, I'd like to see it.

Have you considered the impossibility of establishing the necessary separation of inmates to prevent wildfire spread of COVID in prisons? Additionally, if a republican bailed out someone arrested for a crime which endangered/ended human life, would you carry that same animus for the Republican party?

So....if an individual were to release convicted murderers on the public, that would make said individual a retard or otherwise cement their position as such?

So, in your book, any offense punishable by prison sentence cancels out the Right to Life and makes one fair game for death via disease?

What would you consider to be the traits categorizing one as a RINO?

That's fair. I suppose the next logical question is "Do you carry that same animus for the Republican party?"

Who is the "general public", DH?

According to Snopes, Donald Trump didn't call Republicans the dumbest voting block; so, is Snopes unreliable or is it that Snopes is only unreliable when you need it to be to maintain an illusory world-view?