Imgflip Logo Icon

its really not that hard to see how little of a crap COTW gave when editing this, oh my lord lol

its really not that hard to see how little of a crap COTW gave when editing this, oh my lord lol | YA'LL ARE SO ANGRY AT RICHARD YOU ARE IGNORING THAT THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED WAS OBVIOUSLY EDITED. IF YOU WANT THE VOTE TO STILL COUNT AFTER ITS COMPLETELY CLEAR ITS FAKE, IDK WHATS IN THE WORLD YOU ARE THINKING. BUT WHY, WHY IS IT FAKE? WELL LETS SEE; FIRST OF ALL, COTW'S SCREENSHOTS SIMULTANEOUSLY CLAIM TO BE FROM 2 MONTHS OLD, AND 2 MINUTES OLD. HOW ON EARTH WOULD THAT BE POSSIBLE? WHEN CALLED OUT FOR THIS COTW DELETED THE SCREENSHOT IN QUESTION. TWO DAYS; A POINT THAT KAMI BROUGHT UP IS THAT, IN THE CASE OF A HE-SAID-SHE-SAID SCENARIO, WE MUST TRUST THE ONE WITH THE CLEANER BACKROUND. WHILE THAT IS A FAIR STATEMENT AS FAR AS PERSONAL BELIEF, THERE ARE SOME PROBLEMS WITH THAT AS IT APPLIES TO THIS SITUATION 1. THAT DOES NOT APPLY TO THE COURT OF LAW. IMAGINE IF THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM ARRESTED THE GUYS THAT HAD A BAD BACKROUND, EVEN IF EVIDENCE PROVIDED IS FAULTY. 2. WHILE COTW'S BACKROUND HAS LESS CONTROVERSY, THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO SAY HIS PROOF WAS FAKE, WHICH MEANS IT IS NO LONGER A HE-SAID-SHE-SAID SITUATION. 3. A POINT HE BROUGHT UP IS THAT RICHARD SCREENSHOT CAN JUST AS EASILY BE EDITED AS COTW'S ARE, WHICH AGAIN, IS A FAIR POINT. IF NOT FOR THE FACT THAT RICHARD SCREENSHOTS DONT FREAKING CONTRADICT EACHOTHER. 🤦‍♂️; TWO MONTHS; TO CLARIFY, I DO NOT DEFEND RICHARDS ACTIONS RECENTLY, BUT CMON GUYS WE CAN DO BETTER WHEN EXAMINING EVIDENCE, ITS SO FREAKING OBVIOUS THIS IS FAKE. | image tagged in envoy says,blank grey | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
243 views • 7 upvotes • Made by EnvoyOfTheDeep 3 years ago in IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS
envoy saysblank grey
45 Comments
123gamer101-offical
2 ups, 3y
I used this as evidence and still lost (don't attack Luigi it was his first case so don't attack him)
Vergil_Official
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
WTF happened?
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
a tooooonnn of stuff
Vergil_Official
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Explain. Please.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
what did you see last?
Vergil_Official
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
The image we're on.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
well i assume you’re aware of the richard drama up to this point?
Vergil_Official
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
I haven't been on this stream since..... Well ever.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y
imgflip.com/i/5h39rq this is the doctored evidence. the one we’re commenting on is my rebuttal to it.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
i don’t know how to explain it to you then, you might scroll thru recent images
Vergil_Official
1 up, 3y,
4 replies
Just explain this Richard shit
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
well, you’ll be surprised just how much “hyenas” are in this steam.
Vergil_Official
1 up, 3y
Let me see the screenshots.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
one second
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
well, there’s an assassination system, where someone can hire an assassin to kill a political rival. if they do, they could be prosecuted for murder. well, an assassin did what they do best and assassinated someone. the assassin accused richard of hiring him to do it, however to prove it they used fake screenshots, which makes us question whether or not he did hire him.
Vergil_Official
1 up, 3y
Luckily for you, I have a keen eye for these types of.... people... I like to call them Hyenas
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
oh but i actually like hyenas lol. extremely misunderstood animals.
Vergil_Official
1 up, 3y
I'm talking Tom Clancy Division Hyenas, a bunch of trouble makers.
Slobama
1 up, 3y,
3 replies
Well Richard first denied that he’d ever spoken with COTW (using colorful language), then implicitly admitted he spoke with COTW at least two months ago. So there’s one inconsistency in his defense, if you’re looking for them. Having just been impeached by those who were assassinated, a revenge motive is clear.

Anywho, the assassination scandal is certainly intriguing, but it’s kind of a red herring.

It was legal under the rules of the roleplay at the time. I didn’t know the exact mechanics of it, but seemed like a bad idea for a democratic roleplay — maybe a good idea for a Mafia roleplay, but a bad thing to encourage here when we should be encouraging working together rather than offing political rivals for advantage or sport. Well, it’s now been abolished.

I would rather focus on all the other evidence against Richard that’s undeniable. The IRA. The “die Beez” meme tag from awhile ago. The endless U Mad Bro and Cope comments that 12 year olds use to insult each other.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
2 ups, 3y
and as surly kong pointed out, richard can’t be punished for something that he did prior to laws being made.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
so focus on that. don't commit to this trial ENTIRELY centered around fake evidence.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
We all know how a second trial would go, Envoy. I haven't forgotten the impeachment y'know.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
like i said to kami, if the trial is done properly i can’t and will not stop it. but if the trial makes a mockery of the system i have the power to step in.
Vergil_Official
2 ups, 3y
It seems like IG needs replaced.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
We all know you’ll just step in if it doesn’t go your way.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
4 ups, 3y,
1 reply
IG, every act you have committed, every trial you have held, in this time has been handled wrongly. i am sick and tired of you screwing up and then turning around and blaming me and calling me a tyrant. if you looked for half a second you would’ve seen the evidence was doctored, but you didn’t. you jumped on an opportunity to punish richard further, i never amended a law cause i didn’t get my way, i didn’t ban and impeach someone just because he’s un popular. YOU did. get your crap together and get out of my face.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Finally he snaps and reveals his true colours.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
what a thoughtful reply to a comment that highlighted many of your mistakes, never once acknowledging them. you can’t handle criticism huh?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
9 replies
You can’t moderate without being biased huh?
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y
i don’t believe he officially has that power, but i didn’t see a problem with it and nobody else did so i allowed it.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y
but no, he can’t because the punishment was already decided and this is a separate issue, if he was to give another ban congress would’ve had to vote first, but that vote is now void.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
the screenshots say otherwise.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
you literally double downed, not showing remorse, nor correcting my statement of “comparing”.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
I mean I’m correcting it now.

But if you think this is worthy of punishment but Richard gets off with just a 48 hour ban with you desperately stretching the rules every step of the way then you really do have a serious bias problem.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
if you had problems with that decision being it up with wubbzy.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
So Wubbzy can just extend the ban himself? Well he already expressed support for it, as has Congress, so maybe I will.
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y
bring*
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y
i didn’t pick the 2 day ban, and you didn’t seem to complain .
EnvoyOfTheDeep M
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
man you call any punishment you receive from any mod (global or otherwise) biased. you use that word so much it’s lost it meaning. instead of saying “screw the mods” why don’t you think “huh, maybe they delete my comment for a reason”. but i don’t expect you to realize that you could ever be doing anything wrong, like maybe comparing the lgbtq community to natzis and getting suspended for a week? nah no one would ever do that!
[deleted] M
1 up, 3y
*nazis
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
I don’t expect YOU to ever realise that you could ever be doing anything wrong, like maybe abusing your powers, obstructing the democratic will of the people, defending terrorist trolls or being biased towards people you dislike. And I never compared gays to nazis. I used an example to point out one of the many flaws in your twisted logic. Yet another example of you being biased towards me. And you say I have a grudge against Richard...
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
*spits out water
123gamer101-offical
0 ups, 3y
Mate 2 month's ago is a long time is it possible that he forgot
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 6
  • Envoy Says...
  • Blank grey
  • Capture.PNG
  • 5h3bpy.jpg
  • Blank grey
  • Blank grey
  • Envoy Says...
    • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    YA'LL ARE SO ANGRY AT RICHARD YOU ARE IGNORING THAT THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED WAS OBVIOUSLY EDITED. IF YOU WANT THE VOTE TO STILL COUNT AFTER ITS COMPLETELY CLEAR ITS FAKE, IDK WHATS IN THE WORLD YOU ARE THINKING. BUT WHY, WHY IS IT FAKE? WELL LETS SEE; FIRST OF ALL, COTW'S SCREENSHOTS SIMULTANEOUSLY CLAIM TO BE FROM 2 MONTHS OLD, AND 2 MINUTES OLD. HOW ON EARTH WOULD THAT BE POSSIBLE? WHEN CALLED OUT FOR THIS COTW DELETED THE SCREENSHOT IN QUESTION. TWO DAYS; A POINT THAT KAMI BROUGHT UP IS THAT, IN THE CASE OF A HE-SAID-SHE-SAID SCENARIO, WE MUST TRUST THE ONE WITH THE CLEANER BACKROUND. WHILE THAT IS A FAIR STATEMENT AS FAR AS PERSONAL BELIEF, THERE ARE SOME PROBLEMS WITH THAT AS IT APPLIES TO THIS SITUATION 1. THAT DOES NOT APPLY TO THE COURT OF LAW. IMAGINE IF THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM ARRESTED THE GUYS THAT HAD A BAD BACKROUND, EVEN IF EVIDENCE PROVIDED IS FAULTY. 2. WHILE COTW'S BACKROUND HAS LESS CONTROVERSY, THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO SAY HIS PROOF WAS FAKE, WHICH MEANS IT IS NO LONGER A HE-SAID-SHE-SAID SITUATION. 3. A POINT HE BROUGHT UP IS THAT RICHARD SCREENSHOT CAN JUST AS EASILY BE EDITED AS COTW'S ARE, WHICH AGAIN, IS A FAIR POINT. IF NOT FOR THE FACT THAT RICHARD SCREENSHOTS DONT FREAKING CONTRADICT EACHOTHER. 🤦‍♂️; TWO MONTHS; TO CLARIFY, I DO NOT DEFEND RICHARDS ACTIONS RECENTLY, BUT CMON GUYS WE CAN DO BETTER WHEN EXAMINING EVIDENCE, ITS SO FREAKING OBVIOUS THIS IS FAKE.